there is still a lot of work to be done within the responsiveness of the
effects. it is horrifying.
enclosed herewith is the AWN issue (https://bugs.launchpad.net/awn/+bug/478790)
-- which is important in realising what influences the Intel drivers..
i truly hope this will be resolved in Lucid
I just ran Karmic on the system I had problems with, and it ran just
fine. There is a little bit of sluggishness in some Compiz animations,
mainly around events that involve mapping a window (open, unminimize,
etc). Otherwise, it seems quite good. I have no idea how this is
possible, the only thing
It was app-specific in my case. For example, kvm/qemu was configured to
use something other than pulseaudio, and was fighting with pulseaudio,
causing the video output to be jerky as it used 100% cpu trying to play
sound. Once I reconfigured the errant apps to talk to pulseaudio instead
of whatever
What did you do to resolve the problem re. pulseaudio?
--
Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451523
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Er, nevermind that comment of mine... Turns out it the general problem
was with pulseaudio, not the Intel driver. Aside from the odd glxgears
framerate slowdown, everything is fine, maybe even a bit faster than in
9.04.
--
Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta
https://bugs.launchpad
I'm seeing the same thing here. There is a severe video slowdown with a
fresh 9.10 install on a T61 with Intel X3100 graphics. On 9.04 I
consistently get 4000+ fps; with 9.10 it's just over 2000 fps. glxgears
may not be a proper benchmark, but clearly there is something wrong
here. There are real-w
gxlgears may well not be a good benchmark, but the performance HAS
dropped significantly. Just compare 9.10 to 8.10, they are lightyears
apart in responsiveness. I'm going to run the prescribed Phoronix
benchmarks and report back here - it is unacceptable for this kind of
performance issue to go ig
See this link for more information
http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark
Basically glxgears is not a good benchmark.
In order to compare the graphic performance of two releases, you need at
least to compare results from something such as http://www.phoronix-
test-suite.com/
glxgears is not a valid benchmark.
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451523
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33671466/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33671469/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33671471/Dependencies.txt
** A
10 matches
Mail list logo
