** Package changed: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) => cyborg
** Changed in: cyborg
Assignee: (unassigned) => mit (mit2596)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
** Package changed: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) => cyborg
** Changed in: cyborg
Assignee: (unassigned) => mit (mit2596)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/chkrootkit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/chkrootkit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage
This bug was fixed in the package chkrootkit - 0.50-3ubuntu1
---
chkrootkit (0.50-3ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable. (LP: #454566) Remaining changes:
- debian/patches/fix-stack-smash.patch:
+ Fix segfault when running chkrootkit. (Closes: #767403)
This bug was fixed in the package chkrootkit - 0.50-3ubuntu1
---
chkrootkit (0.50-3ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable. (LP: #454566) Remaining changes:
- debian/patches/fix-stack-smash.patch:
+ Fix segfault when running chkrootkit. (Closes: #767403)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #740898
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740898
** Also affects: chkrootkit (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740898
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #740898
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740898
** Also affects: chkrootkit (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740898
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
Looking at the patch applied in F21, it doesn't seem like Fedora
actually fixed it. They simply check whether /sbin/init is a link to
systemd, and ignore the report if so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in
Looking at the patch applied in F21, it doesn't seem like Fedora
actually fixed it. They simply check whether /sbin/init is a link to
systemd, and ignore the report if so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Fedora fixed it in FC21 with chkrootkit-0.50-4.fc2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636231#c1
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #636231
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636231
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Fedora fixed it in FC21 with chkrootkit-0.50-4.fc2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636231#c1
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #636231
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636231
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
+1 to backporting chkrootkit 0.50.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
+1 to backporting chkrootkit 0.50.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Current version of chkrootkit is 0.50, released on June 4th, 2014. Maybe
we could get that version packaged up and backported?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Current version of chkrootkit is 0.50, released on June 4th, 2014. Maybe
we could get that version packaged up and backported?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False
Alright did some checking for myself, I just went ahead and did the
sha256sum checks on my own as well as hardlink check.
I've made a tutorial to check yourself
--
Testing with Sha256sum/md5sum
First we want to make a sha256sum or md5sum of the init in our system. To do
Alright did some checking for myself, I just went ahead and did the
sha256sum checks on my own as well as hardlink check.
I've made a tutorial to check yourself
--
Testing with Sha256sum/md5sum
First we want to make a sha256sum or md5sum of the init in our system. To do
Confirmed still exists even in Linux Mint. No idea why Ubuntu has this
problem. Maybe it's not a false positive? Who really knows.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
Confirmed still exists even in Linux Mint. No idea why Ubuntu has this
problem. Maybe it's not a false positive? Who really knows.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False
Following comment #30,I've also verified the md5sum of my /sbin/init
with the original package on http://packages.ubuntu.com/ and they do
match.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
Following comment #30,I've also verified the md5sum of my /sbin/init
with the original package on http://packages.ubuntu.com/ and they do
match.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Same here on Lubuntu 14.04 : on a new install chkrootkit reports Warning:
/sbin/init INFECTED but then there's no evidence of this with repeated passes
of unhide and rkhunter.
Apparently,also running chkrootkit -x and chkrootkit -x does not report the
infection,as far as I can see.
--
You
Same here on Lubuntu 14.04 : on a new install chkrootkit reports Warning:
/sbin/init INFECTED but then there's no evidence of this with repeated passes
of unhide and rkhunter.
Apparently,also running chkrootkit -x and chkrootkit -x does not report the
infection,as far as I can see.
--
You
I also get this notice on 14.04 and Linux Mint 17(based on 14.04)
chkroothit -n
Searching for Suckit rootkit...Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
I also get this notice on 14.04 and Linux Mint 17(based on 14.04)
chkroothit -n
Searching for Suckit rootkit...Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Just upgraded two machines to 14.04; one of them is still getting this.
I wonder why there is no option on Ubuntu's and put your money where
your mouth is page for fix known bugs instead of fiddling with the
GUI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Just upgraded two machines to 14.04; one of them is still getting this.
I wonder why there is no option on Ubuntu's and put your money where
your mouth is page for fix known bugs instead of fiddling with the
GUI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
After an upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 I got a scared with the message
suckit rootkit detected, too. rkhunter does not find anything. Here is
the MD5SUM of my /sbin/init
c9b343f85e6804e2d7ee70b810b1a15a /sbin/init
which is the same as found in /var/lib/dpkg/info/upstart.md5sums.
--
You received
After an upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 I got a scared with the message
suckit rootkit detected, too. rkhunter does not find anything. Here is
the MD5SUM of my /sbin/init
c9b343f85e6804e2d7ee70b810b1a15a /sbin/init
which is the same as found in /var/lib/dpkg/info/upstart.md5sums.
--
You received
In most major new distros (including redhat and ubuntu) strings /sbin/init |
grep HOME returns:
XDG_CACHE_HOME
XDG_CONFIG_HOME
which still triggers an alert (false positive) for suckit rootkit in
14.04.
I checked the suckit source, and it gives:
sk2rc2$ strings ./src/sk | grep HOME
HOME=%s
So
heres a patch for it
** Patch added: Chkroot suckit false positive fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/454566/+attachment/4095317/+files/chkrootkit_suckit_false_positive.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
The attachment Chkroot suckit false positive fix seems to be a patch.
If it isn't, please remove the patch flag from the attachment, remove
the patch tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers,
unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
In most major new distros (including redhat and ubuntu) strings /sbin/init |
grep HOME returns:
XDG_CACHE_HOME
XDG_CONFIG_HOME
which still triggers an alert (false positive) for suckit rootkit in
14.04.
I checked the suckit source, and it gives:
sk2rc2$ strings ./src/sk | grep HOME
HOME=%s
So
heres a patch for it
** Patch added: Chkroot suckit false positive fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/454566/+attachment/4095317/+files/chkrootkit_suckit_false_positive.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The attachment Chkroot suckit false positive fix seems to be a patch.
If it isn't, please remove the patch flag from the attachment, remove
the patch tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers,
unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
exits in
xubuntu 13.10 32bit
and you may get egrep not found error as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage
exits in
xubuntu 13.10 32bit
and you may get egrep not found error as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this
PROBLEM STILL EXISTS ON 14.04 LTS!!!
please either fix chkrootkit or change /sbin/init - I hope in a more
security aware post snowden era this will now trigger some more action -
certainly many users will be very irritated about this.
This does not happen on other distros. Must be fixed before
PROBLEM STILL EXISTS ON 14.04 LTS!!!
please either fix chkrootkit or change /sbin/init - I hope in a more
security aware post snowden era this will now trigger some more action -
certainly many users will be very irritated about this.
This does not happen on other distros. Must be fixed before
Problem still exists on 13.10 / amd64. I've dumped /sbin/init with
debugfs, compared it with the one from the package and they are
identical. /sbin/init seems to match 'HOME' and /proc/1/maps does not
match 'init.'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Problem still exists on 13.10 / amd64. I've dumped /sbin/init with
debugfs, compared it with the one from the package and they are
identical. /sbin/init seems to match 'HOME' and /proc/1/maps does not
match 'init.'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Yes same for me with a fresh install of 13.04 this bug still shows
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage
Yes same for me with a fresh install of 13.04 this bug still shows
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this bug go
This went away in 12.10 and reappared when I upgraded to 13.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications
This went away in 12.10 and reappared when I upgraded to 13.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
For those similarly affected: I recently reinstalled the upstart package
(0.6.5-8) on Lucid (10.04.4) and then received the Suckit [false] flag
from chkrootkit 0.49-3 (as well as the version in Debian Wheezy
(0.49-4.1)). After restarting the server, the flag disappeared. So, it
appears to be
For those similarly affected: I recently reinstalled the upstart package
(0.6.5-8) on Lucid (10.04.4) and then received the Suckit [false] flag
from chkrootkit 0.49-3 (as well as the version in Debian Wheezy
(0.49-4.1)). After restarting the server, the flag disappeared. So, it
appears to be
Same here, also a falsepos (conclusion after doing the other usual tests
for Suckit). The problem exists in Lucid Lynx:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
$ apt-cache show chkrootkit
Same here, also a falsepos (conclusion after doing the other usual tests
for Suckit). The problem exists in Lucid Lynx:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
$ apt-cache show chkrootkit
+1 on Maverick after installing upstart 0.6.6-4 on 2011-02-11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
+1 on Maverick after installing upstart 0.6.6-4 on 2011-02-11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Confirmed on Maverick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Confirmed on Maverick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
Title:
False positive for SucKit
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist = Medium
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Same thing for me. After my Lucid box ran weekly updates I started
seeing the Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init
INFECTED message from chkrootkit.
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist = Medium
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Same thing for me. After my Lucid box ran weekly updates I started
seeing the Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init
INFECTED message from chkrootkit.
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On Thursday, 2010-08-19 at 08:02:45 -, Maxime wrote:
I can confirm the issue on Lucid. It's probably related to an upstart
update to 0.6.5-7.
[...]
Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning:
/sbin/init INFECTED
[...]
# strings /sbin/init | egrep HOME
# cat
i have exact the same behavior and output as Maxime wrote in #14.
This false positive happens on my box since 17.08.2010 after this update:
Preparing to replace upstart 0.6.5-6 (using
.../upstart_0.6.5-7_amd64.deb)
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received
i have exact the same behavior and output as Maxime wrote in #14.
This false positive happens on my box since 17.08.2010 after this update:
Preparing to replace upstart 0.6.5-6 (using
.../upstart_0.6.5-7_amd64.deb)
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received
I can confirm the issue on Lucid. It's probably related to an upstart
update to 0.6.5-7.
# lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
# chkrootkit -V
chkrootkit version 0.49
# chkrootkit
[...]
Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init
INFECTED
I can confirm the issue on Lucid. It's probably related to an upstart
update to 0.6.5-7.
# lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
# chkrootkit -V
chkrootkit version 0.49
# chkrootkit
[...]
Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init
INFECTED
I've got a reproduction here on a Lucid install.
Linux Neptune 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 06:07:29 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
mes...@neptune:/sbin$ sudo chkrootkit -V
chkrootkit version 0.49
Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning:
/sbin/init INFECTED
I've got a reproduction here on a Lucid install.
Linux Neptune 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 06:07:29 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
mes...@neptune:/sbin$ sudo chkrootkit -V
chkrootkit version 0.49
Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning:
/sbin/init INFECTED
can you try to reproduce this on lucid please?
chuck
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
On Wednesday, 2010-04-28 at 18:09:39 -, Chuck Short wrote:
can you try to reproduce this on lucid please?
Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing
found
I believe the false positive was gone for quite a while, probably due to
changes in init.
Lupe Christoph
--
|
can you try to reproduce this on lucid please?
chuck
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
On Wednesday, 2010-04-28 at 18:09:39 -, Chuck Short wrote:
can you try to reproduce this on lucid please?
Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing
found
I believe the false positive was gone for quite a while, probably due to
changes in init.
Lupe Christoph
--
|
False positives with such tools come with the territory. Refused as a
server papercut during 20100217 meeting.
** Changed in: server-papercuts
Status: New = Invalid
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a
False positives with such tools come with the territory. Refused as a
server papercut during 20100217 meeting.
** Changed in: server-papercuts
Status: New = Invalid
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a
I'm pretty sure I saw the string HOME in /sbin/init, but I can't prove
it anymore.
BTW, expertmode_output is just debugging:
expertmode_output() {
echo ###
echo ### Output of: $1
echo ###
eval $1 21
#cat EOF
#`$1 21`
#EOF
return 0
}
--
False positive for SucKit
I'm pretty sure I saw the string HOME in /sbin/init, but I can't prove
it anymore.
BTW, expertmode_output is just debugging:
expertmode_output() {
echo ###
echo ### Output of: $1
echo ###
eval $1 21
#cat EOF
#`$1 21`
#EOF
return 0
}
--
False positive for SucKit
** Also affects: server-papercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.
--
Just tried on latest karmic and it does not fail:
ii chkrootkit 0.48-10
ii upstart0.6.3-11
$ ls -li /sbin/init /sbin/telinit
444149 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 169676 2009-12-10 17:19 /sbin/init
448912 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 79312 2009-12-10 17:19 /sbin/telinit
Can you please confirm
I have seen this problem pop up a few times since I reported it and
vanish again. Must be related to Phase of Moon. Right now it has
disappeared:
Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing
found
chkrootkit:
Installed: 0.48-10
The version of chkrootkit is still the
I don't think that chkrootkit alerting about this rootkit is related to
upstart init changes, but the output from /proc/1/maps instead.
Something like this should improve the test:
expertmode_output ${egrep} '^[^/]+${ROOTDIR}sbin/init.'
${ROOTDIR}proc/1/maps
What do you think?
--
False
** Also affects: server-papercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Just tried on latest karmic and it does not fail:
ii chkrootkit 0.48-10
ii upstart0.6.3-11
$ ls -li /sbin/init /sbin/telinit
444149 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 169676 2009-12-10 17:19 /sbin/init
448912 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 79312 2009-12-10 17:19 /sbin/telinit
Can you please confirm
I have seen this problem pop up a few times since I reported it and
vanish again. Must be related to Phase of Moon. Right now it has
disappeared:
Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing
found
chkrootkit:
Installed: 0.48-10
The version of chkrootkit is still the
I don't think that chkrootkit alerting about this rootkit is related to
upstart init changes, but the output from /proc/1/maps instead.
Something like this should improve the test:
expertmode_output ${egrep} '^[^/]+${ROOTDIR}sbin/init.'
${ROOTDIR}proc/1/maps
What do you think?
--
False
Confirmed in Karmic. I posted this to the Ubuntu forums and was referred this
bug report.
My forums post is here:http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1386791
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Confirmed in Karmic. I posted this to the Ubuntu forums and was referred this
bug report.
My forums post is here:http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1386791
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks for the bug report. This will be looked at again for karmic+1.
Regards
chuck
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Wishlist
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You
Thanks for the bug report. This will be looked at again for karmic+1.
Regards
chuck
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Wishlist
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You
Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to
improve it.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
False positive for SucKit
On Monday, 2009-10-19 at 13:18:45 -, Chuck Short wrote:
Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to
improve it.
Well, as there are some finer tests on the page I mentioned, what about
implementing them in chkrootkit?
Lupe Christoph
--
| There is no substitute
Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to
improve it.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
False positive for SucKit
On Monday, 2009-10-19 at 13:18:45 -, Chuck Short wrote:
Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to
improve it.
Well, as there are some finer tests on the page I mentioned, what about
implementing them in chkrootkit?
Lupe Christoph
--
| There is no substitute
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872395/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872396/XsessionErrors.txt
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872395/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872396/XsessionErrors.txt
--
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug
93 matches
Mail list logo