[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package aptitude - 0.6.6-1ubuntu1 --- aptitude (0.6.6-1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes: - debian/05aptitude: Never autoremove kernels. - Drop aptitude-doc to Suggests. - 03_branding: Ubuntu branding.

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-28 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 Title: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updat

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-28 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: aptitude Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 Title: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-28 Thread Stephan Springer
Aptitude 0.6.6-1 has been released, which should fix this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 Title: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:debian/aptitude -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 Title: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not wr

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: aptitude Status: Unknown => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 Title: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hou

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2012-03-16 Thread Stephan Springer
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #476399 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476399 ** Also affects: aptitude via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476399 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2011-10-19 Thread Rolf Leggewie
** Tags added: lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 Title: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2010-03-14 Thread David Pottage
I am also seeing this issue in Lucid Lynx (Alpha 3) in a Virtual Box VM. Could it be significant that my update system is: aptitude update aptitude -d -y dist-upgrade Then run update-manager via the GUI to actually install the packages that the command lines above? Perhaps aptitude is not setti

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2009-10-27 Thread Jedasothi
So, if there were any error produced in updating one of the repositories, the results would be as described: update-manager would correctly find and install updates, but not update the time stamp and so continuously report that updating is needed? I no longer recall, but it could be that I had a

[Bug 454941] Re: thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)

2009-10-27 Thread _dan_
I have errors from third party repos, so that explains my issue -- thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug