Re: [Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-29 Thread kornelix
Yes, I have reported several bugs, some of which actually got fixed, but not because I reported them. 1800 bugs per week is a problem. Some FOSS developers release buggy apps and hope someone else will fix them. Some like to wait for the next release. Some are thankfully very conscientious, like th

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-29 Thread Fabio Marconi
No, we are few people against too much bugs and majority of us is not payed. We do this in free time, and on first obviously we take a look at our package that we have chose to follow. On average, over 1,800 bugs are filed every week with more than 600,000 bugs filed so far. The Bug Squad is alwa

Re: [Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-28 Thread kornelix
It was likely the kernel scheduler. I did not say this because I did not trust my judgment. So your rule is to ignore bugs without a package assigned? And you don't even ask? Bad rule. On 08/29/2010 12:35 AM, Fabio Marconi wrote: > Hello kornelix > I admit that is not easy to understand, but if

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-28 Thread Fabio Marconi
Hello kornelix I admit that is not easy to understand, but if there was un update that solves a bug, here in Launchpad we cannot know the root cause, only developers know that. Is not the bug that is invalid, but the report, actually solved. Launchpad is the media to transmit a bug to the right d

Re: [Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-28 Thread kornelix
That was not my question. Something was fixed and now the problem is gone. How does that translate into a status "invalid"? I don't think anyone took a serious look anyway, so it does not matter. On 08/28/2010 06:35 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote: > Hello kornelix > You said: > The problem appears to be

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-28 Thread Fabio Marconi
Hello kornelix You said: The problem appears to be gone or almost gone in Lucid. If you don't agree, simply change the status. you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. Fabio -- e

Re: [Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-28 Thread kornelix
Why did you change the status to "invalid"? Something in the kernel was clearly changed to make the improvements noted, we just don't know what. On 08/27/2010 10:45 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote: > Thanks for the reply > This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being > f

Re: [Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-27 Thread kornelix
On 08/27/2010 03:41 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote: > Hello > Is this problem present with the latest updated Karmic's or Lucid's packages? > Thanks in advance > Fabio > > ** Changed in: ubuntu > Status: New => Incomplete > The problem appears to be gone or almost gone in Lucid. I ran benchmark

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-27 Thread Fabio Marconi
Thanks for the reply This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down b

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2010-08-27 Thread Fabio Marconi
Hello Is this problem present with the latest updated Karmic's or Lucid's packages? Thanks in advance Fabio ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2009-12-15 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Tags added: karmic ** Tags added: regression-release -- erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2009-10-25 Thread kornelix
Maybe this kernel is scheduling a hyper-thread CPU even when a "regular" CPU is available. This would cause thread performance to go down about 50%. This would not account for the variance in measured CPU time. -- erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628 You

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2009-10-24 Thread kornelix
Information I should have included: The tests were done on a processor with 4 cores, hence the CPU time for 4 threads can be 400% of the elapsed time. -- erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

2009-10-24 Thread kornelix
I wish your bug report system would not mangle formatted inputs. I have added the entire report as an attachment. Please view with fixed-width font (e.g. gedit). ** Attachment added: "kernel bug" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34311813/kernel%20bug -- erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.3