** Changed in: coreutils (Debian)
Status: Won't Fix = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
Title:
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
To manage
While this might be a valid request for a change to the kernel, it will
have to be come from upstream in order for us to consider it. In any
case, the change wouldn't meed our requirements to be applied as an SRU
to Lucid:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelUpdates
Set to wontfix
**
This bug was fixed in the package coreutils - 8.5-1ubuntu5
---
coreutils (8.5-1ubuntu5) natty; urgency=low
* debian/patches/80_fedora_sysinfo.dpatch: make 'uname -i -p' return the
real processor/hardware, instead of unknown. Patch cherry-picked from
Fedora 12 (original:
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/coreutils
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
Title:
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: coreutils (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
Title:
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
For the record, I have added the Debian bug about this --
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=193170.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #193170
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=193170
** Also affects: coreutils (Debian) via
** Tags added: kj-triage
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Now would be the time in the cycle to get such change in, Colin, Mathias
do you think it makes sense? Could you sponsor it if that's the case?
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
the merge request comment suggest upstream didn't ack the patch so
unsubscribing sponsors
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Upstream coreutils will not ack the patch; this has been discussed over
and over upstream, and their position is this is a service that should
be provided by the kernel (via sysinfo() or uname(), probably).
As such we either carry this delta, or close this bug WONTFIX.
--
uname -p and uname -i
so lets add 'linux' to this bug, if it's fixed in either that or
coreutils depending on the outcome.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification
No, I think once again it is too late for this. It should go in pre-
feature freeze.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Branch linked: lp:~ari-tczew/ubuntu/maverick/coreutils/lp-470550
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I tested this patch and it works. Waiting for ACK from ubuntu-release
team.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Could somebody get that change in maverick now?
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
We should have dealt with this before, but I'm afraid that it seems that
at this point this is far too risky to do for Lucid. Won't-Fixing for
Lucid, and we can reconsider this for Maverick.
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: coreutils
un-assigning myself, marking as Triaged, waiting for Sponsorship.
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: C de-Avillez (hggdh2) = (unassigned)
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
Milestoning: this breaks some 3rd party installer scripts.
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.04
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You
For the record, my PPA has a GIT coreutils package for Lucid with this
patch in (https://edge.launchpad.net/~hggdh2/+archive/ppa).
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: lucid-alpha-1 = None
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi all,
Have the problem Ubuntu 9.10 :
ubuntu:/usr$ uname -i
unknown
ubuntu:/usr$
But i've found another uname installed :
ubuntu:/usr$ /usr/lib/klibc/bin/uname -i
i386
ubuntu:/usr$
This is working well :
ubuntu:/usr$ /usr/lib/klibc/bin/uname -a
Linux ubuntu 2.6.31-15-generic #50-Ubuntu
i686 is your processor's and i386 is the kernel's
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@linflaas:
/usr/lib/klibc/bin is provided by the libklibc package, and is for use with
initramfs. This is a work-in-progress, and does *not* replace coreutils.
I really do not think you should use it in lieu of the standard
utilities in coreutils.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
OK txs a lot.
i then will wait for release ;)
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
that ppa works fine uname -i and uname -p worked
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On 03.11.2009 18:03, C de-Avillez wrote:
uh. Doko, you mention apparently on other distributions. Do you have a
reference to give me?
asked somebody to check on Fedora, which apparently sets these.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You
uname -i in fedora 12 gave me i386.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Thanks. I will download the sources for coreutils on Fedora 12, and see
what goes on there.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I cherry-picked the uname patch from Fedora 12; tested it locally, on
Karmic, Lucid, and on coreutils GIT. All seem to work without a glitch.
I am publishing coreutils 7.4-2ubuntu2 on my PPA, and attaching the
debdiff for Lucid here. Nevertheless, I would really appreciate some
more tests.
**
Also see bug 111863.
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
uh. Doko, you mention apparently on other distributions. Do you have a
reference to give me?
--
uname -p and uname -i reporting `unknown'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This has been discussed upstream; see:
* http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-09/msg00053.html for a
more discussed thread, or
* http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-04/msg00089.html for a
to-the-point one.
There are other hits, BTW.
Summary, as far as I can
33 matches
Mail list logo
