[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-07-01 Thread itismike
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 359997 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359997 ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 359997 Improve record-your-passphrase dialog -- Passphrase not verified for encrypted

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-04-11 Thread itismike
I think both issues will be resolved with bug 359997. You may want to add your second comment to that bug and ask if it's appropriate to open another bug for that. This one I'd mark as Invalid. -MIke -- Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495339 You

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-04-10 Thread WubiNeophyte
No reason given as to why this was marked invalid. Reinstating. ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-04-10 Thread itismike
Actually I think it is invalid. The prompt was incredibly confusing, and wasn't actually _asking_ for a passphrase... it was about to _give_ you an automatically-generated passphrase, so you can write it down if you like. See PhysicsDan's clarification here:

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-04-10 Thread WubiNeophyte
itismike, Ok. That sort of makes sense now. Unfortunately, I still have two issues with the dialog that is presented, as of the Lucid Beta: 1) The dialog is still pretty confusing, with lots of poor word choices, and poor explanations for end users. 2) The button to show the unwrapped

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-02-20 Thread WubiNeophyte
As I stated in the question version of this bug, this issue is not resolved. The dialogue presented to the user is in no way user-friendly, and provokes the response that is seen here. An implied response of RTFM is not acceptable, as Ubuntu is intended for Human Beings. This bug should address

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-02-20 Thread WubiNeophyte
itismike: it is not a dupe. I intentionally filed this separately, as I can't speak to the other issues in bug 359997. One issue, one bug. This certainly could be solved without solving bug 359997. -- Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495339 You

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-02-19 Thread itismike
is this a dup of bug 359997? -- Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2010-02-17 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+question/101452 -- Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495339 You received this bug

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2009-12-12 Thread WubiNeophyte
Dave, Not sure I'll be able to clarify much for you. Now that the install is complete, I have no plans to retry until it's necessary. Am reporting the bug because I'm hoping to avoid potential issues in the future. I don't think I did anything fancy. I just installed Karmic from the CD

[Bug 495339] Re: Passphrase not verified for encrypted homes

2009-12-10 Thread Dave Walker
I would be happy to confirm this bug but I would like to get some additional information so I am sure what the problem is. I personally do not use an encrypted home but I am happy to setup a test machine, reproduce the problem so I can confirm the bug. This is necessary before a developer has