** Changed in: phatch (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Can some MOTU put the importance of this bug to wishlist? (It is more a
feature request.)
--
Performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Summary changed:
- performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a
picture
+ Performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a
picture
--
Performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.n
@Ken
Ok, I'll remove you from bug assignments so other people feel free to pick up
the bug. In case you have again time, reassign them to yourself.
Thanks for the update!
** Changed in: phatch
Assignee: Ken Seehart (kenseehart) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: phatch (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
I'm pretty busy with my day job so I don't know when I'd be able to get
to this. Please feel free to reassign this to someone else (I'll make
another note here if I start working on it).
--
performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Changed in: phatch
Milestone: 0.2.7 => 0.2.8
--
performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Oh, my pretty ascii art :(
--
performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I'm hesitating between option #1 and #3. If you implement #3, it should
not be YES/NO, it should have clear button labels. It could look like
this:
_
| Resume session? X|
-
@Ken
That is what I had in mind with 2. Some minor changes:
- I would store the session information in Phatchs user cache folder
- The session info should always be cleared if:
- The whole batch process is done
- The user does not resume a previous session
- The UI could be implemented like
How about keeping a session file in the target directory which contains
metadata: timestamp, sufficient information to resume a session that
ended.
if a session file exists in the target directory:
if the session metadata matches the current batch specification (actions,
parameters, etc):
** Changed in: phatch
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: phatch (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497594
You received this bug notification because
Yes, basically #2 makes sense :) this was the main reason/use case I had
in mind.
--
performance: check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
These are two different issues:
1) check for existing files *before* doing the processing on a picture
2) Resuming a session with (thousand) images
2 could be much more easy to fix. We could provide a "Tools>Resume
Session" entry. This invokes a GUI where you can choose from previous
unfinished se
13 matches
Mail list logo