[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2009-04-30 Thread Helge
Portmap isn't needed. The problem is solved by using the '-o nolock' mount option. However, I do agree it would be smart to recommend portmap in ubuntu- standard. -- Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50558 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-10-13 Thread JohnFlux
I also had the problem that nfs took ages. Installing portmap works for me - after installing it now mounts instantly. To test, if I do /etc/init.d/portmap stop then mounting takes ages again. -- Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50558 You received this

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-04-29 Thread pete
My bad. Killed the portmap process and tried to mount another nfs share, still seems to mount fine. I don't really know much about portmap, I'm probably missing something here. -- Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50558 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-04-29 Thread Dave Gilbert
I haven't tried this yet, but it looks to me like nfs-common has a dependency on portmap - so is that causing it to install and start portmap? What happens if you install nfs-common but explicitly stop portmap? Dave -- Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50558

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-04-29 Thread pete
Installing package nfs-common fixes it for me, I wonder if anyone else would confirm this? -- Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-04-19 Thread Dave Gilbert
I can confirm it still occurs on feisty. I've looked at what goes on with wireshark on 'lo'; something somewhere is doing a portmap [Program Version: 2] [V2 Procedure: SET (1)] Program: NLM (100021) Version: 1 Proto: TCP (6) Port: 38824 Which gave me an idea - it is locking related;

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-04-18 Thread Philip Paquette
Leaving at confirmed. Hopefully a developer will look at it. ** Changed in: portmap (Ubuntu) Assignee: Philip Paquette => (unassigned) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50558 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2007-04-15 Thread Philip Paquette
Setting package from (undefined) to portmap, so it gets out of the bug list without package. Also, can you confirm this bug still applies in edgy/feisty? Thanks ** Changed in: portmap (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => portmap Assignee: (unassigned) => Philip Paquette Status: Confirm

[Bug 50558] Re: Lack of portmap makes nfs mounts slow

2006-10-26 Thread Torbjørn Sund
This bug has also been reported in bug 48366. Portmap is definitely needed for nfs mounts - unless one considers 1m30s waits ok. It has nothing to do with the liveCD as such. The wait occurs also in Thunderbird when accessing nfs-mounted mail directories. Unless there is a good reason for not inst