[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2011-08-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116 Title: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2012-03-26 Thread Calvin Spealman
It should be noted that this bug is not related to NFS, specifically, but any network mounts handled by autofs. I have this same problem with my samba/CIFS shares. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2011-01-07 Thread MountainX
I'm running 10.10 and it fails to suspend to RAM if I have used any NFS shares. Even if no files are currently open, if some files on a share were previously opened during the current session, Ubuntu will fail to suspend. If I log out and log back in, I can suspend if I do so before beginning any w

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2011-01-07 Thread Wizzu
@MountainX: What you did should be enough in theory. You can test it manually too: run "./autofs suspend" as root before selecting suspend from the menu, and see if it helps. Any/all unused autofs shares should be umounted by the script. But I don't know if the 10.10 suspend setup is similar to

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2011-01-07 Thread MountainX
I mount my NFS shares via /etc/fstab using entries such as: 10.10.1.1:/home/shared /home/shared nfs auto,rw,noatime 0 0 Is the "auto" option used there the same as (or related to) the autofs mentioned in this bug report? I had assumed so, but now I realize I might be wrong because when I run "

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2011-01-07 Thread Wizzu
@MountainX: No, the "auto" option for /etc/fstab is different to "autofs". The "auto option" mounts the filesystem in question automatically at boot time. "autofs" is a program/daemon which mounts/unmounts NFS shares on-demand. It's an alternative way to mount NFS shares so to speak, and in this

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2011-01-07 Thread MountainX
Wizzu, thank you. As a next step I will try autofs with your script. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116 Title: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2010-01-16 Thread Wizzu
Here's a script I created that seems to work on my system for this purpose. I placed it in /etc/pm/sleep.d/80_autofs Of course, as expected, if any of the automounted shares are busy (any files open), it won't do anything for them. It's just a "best effort" attempt. ** Attachment added: "autofs"

[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils

2010-01-18 Thread Chuck Short
** Package changed: autofs (Ubuntu) => pm-utils (Ubuntu) -- autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b