[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libticalcs - 1.1.3+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 --- libticalcs (1.1.3+dfsg1-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Merge the following changes from Ubuntu libticalcs2 - 1.1.3-0ubuntu1 (LP: #507740): [Chris Coulson ] - code changes from upstream version 1.1

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
** Changed in: libticalcs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: libticalcs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Emmet Hikory (persia) -- libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507740 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-11 Thread Kamal Mostafa
Attached branch merges Ubuntu's libticalcs2 - 1.1.3-0ubuntu1 into the 'libticalcs' tree to create libticalcs - 1.1.3+dfsg1-1ubuntu1. After this branch is uploaded, package 'libticalcs2' should be removed. Note: per discussion with ScottK in IRC, this can be reviewed by any MOTU -- it need not wai

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-11 Thread Kamal Mostafa
** Branch linked: lp:~kamalmostafa/ubuntu/lucid/libticalcs/merge-507740 -- libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-06 Thread Kamal Mostafa
Hi Scott H. - The merge work for libtifiles and libticalcs is actually done, and just awaiting review by Scott Kitterman, since he originally assigned me to this task. (See the branches attached to this bug and LP: #507741 -- feel free to review and comment yourself also). I'll be happy to handl

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-06 Thread Scott Howard
one more thing, libticables2 and libticables are different versions (1.2 and 1.3), and there is an api break if you were to merge and drop. -- libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-02-06 Thread Scott Howard
Hi Kamal, I just want to check in and see how this is going. The libti*2 libraries appear to be interfering with some other packages: bug #221332. If there is not enough time to get this in for the debian import/FFE, should we aim for lucid+1? Do you need any help with this? ~Scott Howard -- libt

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-01-15 Thread Kamal Mostafa
** Branch linked: lp:~kamalmostafa/ubuntu/lucid/libticalcs/libti- backmerge -- libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-01-14 Thread Kamal Mostafa
** Description changed: - - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36573671/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.libticalcs_1.1.3%2Bdfsg1-1_MANUALDEPWAIT.txt.gz + http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36573671/buildlog_ubuntu- + lucid-i386.libticalcs_1.1.3%2Bdfsg1-1_MANUALDEPWAIT.txt.gz E: Couldn't find package libti

[Bug 507740] Re: libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev

2010-01-14 Thread Kamal Mostafa
Side note: What about libticables2? Does it need the same "merge and drop the 2" treatment? (libticalcs-dev depends on libticables2-dev) ** Branch linked: lp:~kamalmostafa/ubuntu/lucid/libticalcs/libti-backmerge -- libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5077