[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-06-29 Thread Rui Mesquita
seems to me like this is the most appropriate team to assign this audacity bug to, or possibly the Desktop Team, or possibly the MOTU media team. :-) sorry if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU Pro Audio Team -- export to mp3 support missing (libmp3l

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Hi Rui, Strictly speaking, I don't think this is a bug. The reason is that audacity works without mp3 export. There are people who won't want to install the mp3 encoding libraries but still use audacity. If you don't object, I think I will close this bug. Alex -- export to mp3 support missing

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Rui Mesquita
Hi, My point wasn't wether the user would or not want to install mp3 support. It's the fact that even when the user does install mp3 support, he/she has to point audacity to a shared object which does not have the same filename (or indeed, the same file extension) requested by the program, and so

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Sorry, I misunderstood you Rui. I can confirm that this situation occurs on edgy with version audacity_1.2.4b-2.1ubuntu1_i386. I think this can be classified as a bug. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU Pro Audio Team => (unassigned) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed --

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2007-05-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
Unfortunately, license constraints prevent direct linking of the lame libraries with audacity. Version 1.3.2-3 includes an adjustment to improve the search for libmp3lame, which makes the manual configuration of mp3 support fairly simple for those with lame installed. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubu

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-06-29 Thread Rui Mesquita
seems to me like this is the most appropriate team to assign this audacity bug to, or possibly the Desktop Team, or possibly the MOTU media team. :-) sorry if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU Pro Audio Team -- export to mp3 support missing (libmp3l

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Hi Rui, Strictly speaking, I don't think this is a bug. The reason is that audacity works without mp3 export. There are people who won't want to install the mp3 encoding libraries but still use audacity. If you don't object, I think I will close this bug. Alex -- export to mp3 support missing

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Rui Mesquita
Hi, My point wasn't wether the user would or not want to install mp3 support. It's the fact that even when the user does install mp3 support, he/she has to point audacity to a shared object which does not have the same filename (or indeed, the same file extension) requested by the program, and so

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Sorry, I misunderstood you Rui. I can confirm that this situation occurs on edgy with version audacity_1.2.4b-2.1ubuntu1_i386. I think this can be classified as a bug. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU Pro Audio Team => (unassigned) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed --

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-06-29 Thread Rui Mesquita
seems to me like this is the most appropriate team to assign this audacity bug to, or possibly the Desktop Team, or possibly the MOTU media team. :-) sorry if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU Pro Audio Team -- export to mp3 support missing (libmp3l

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2007-05-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
Unfortunately, license constraints prevent direct linking of the lame libraries with audacity. Version 1.3.2-3 includes an adjustment to improve the search for libmp3lame, which makes the manual configuration of mp3 support fairly simple for those with lame installed. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubu

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Hi Rui, Strictly speaking, I don't think this is a bug. The reason is that audacity works without mp3 export. There are people who won't want to install the mp3 encoding libraries but still use audacity. If you don't object, I think I will close this bug. Alex -- export to mp3 support missing

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Rui Mesquita
Hi, My point wasn't wether the user would or not want to install mp3 support. It's the fact that even when the user does install mp3 support, he/she has to point audacity to a shared object which does not have the same filename (or indeed, the same file extension) requested by the program, and so

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Sorry, I misunderstood you Rui. I can confirm that this situation occurs on edgy with version audacity_1.2.4b-2.1ubuntu1_i386. I think this can be classified as a bug. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU Pro Audio Team => (unassigned) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed --

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2007-05-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
Unfortunately, license constraints prevent direct linking of the lame libraries with audacity. Version 1.3.2-3 includes an adjustment to improve the search for libmp3lame, which makes the manual configuration of mp3 support fairly simple for those with lame installed. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubu

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-06-29 Thread Rui Mesquita
seems to me like this is the most appropriate team to assign this audacity bug to, or possibly the Desktop Team, or possibly the MOTU media team. :-) sorry if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU Pro Audio Team -- export to mp3 support missing (libmp3l

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Hi Rui, Strictly speaking, I don't think this is a bug. The reason is that audacity works without mp3 export. There are people who won't want to install the mp3 encoding libraries but still use audacity. If you don't object, I think I will close this bug. Alex -- export to mp3 support missing

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Rui Mesquita
Hi, My point wasn't wether the user would or not want to install mp3 support. It's the fact that even when the user does install mp3 support, he/she has to point audacity to a shared object which does not have the same filename (or indeed, the same file extension) requested by the program, and so

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Sorry, I misunderstood you Rui. I can confirm that this situation occurs on edgy with version audacity_1.2.4b-2.1ubuntu1_i386. I think this can be classified as a bug. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU Pro Audio Team => (unassigned) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed --

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2007-05-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
Unfortunately, license constraints prevent direct linking of the lame libraries with audacity. Version 1.3.2-3 includes an adjustment to improve the search for libmp3lame, which makes the manual configuration of mp3 support fairly simple for those with lame installed. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubu

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-06-29 Thread Rui Mesquita
seems to me like this is the most appropriate team to assign this audacity bug to, or possibly the Desktop Team, or possibly the MOTU media team. :-) sorry if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU Pro Audio Team -- export to mp3 support missing (libmp3l

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Hi Rui, Strictly speaking, I don't think this is a bug. The reason is that audacity works without mp3 export. There are people who won't want to install the mp3 encoding libraries but still use audacity. If you don't object, I think I will close this bug. Alex -- export to mp3 support missing

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Rui Mesquita
Hi, My point wasn't wether the user would or not want to install mp3 support. It's the fact that even when the user does install mp3 support, he/she has to point audacity to a shared object which does not have the same filename (or indeed, the same file extension) requested by the program, and so

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Sorry, I misunderstood you Rui. I can confirm that this situation occurs on edgy with version audacity_1.2.4b-2.1ubuntu1_i386. I think this can be classified as a bug. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU Pro Audio Team => (unassigned) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed --

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-06-29 Thread Rui Mesquita
seems to me like this is the most appropriate team to assign this audacity bug to, or possibly the Desktop Team, or possibly the MOTU media team. :-) sorry if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU Pro Audio Team -- export to mp3 support missing (libmp3l

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Hi Rui, Strictly speaking, I don't think this is a bug. The reason is that audacity works without mp3 export. There are people who won't want to install the mp3 encoding libraries but still use audacity. If you don't object, I think I will close this bug. Alex -- export to mp3 support missing

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Rui Mesquita
Hi, My point wasn't wether the user would or not want to install mp3 support. It's the fact that even when the user does install mp3 support, he/she has to point audacity to a shared object which does not have the same filename (or indeed, the same file extension) requested by the program, and so

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2006-10-31 Thread Alex Sutcliffe
Sorry, I misunderstood you Rui. I can confirm that this situation occurs on edgy with version audacity_1.2.4b-2.1ubuntu1_i386. I think this can be classified as a bug. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubuntu) Assignee: MOTU Pro Audio Team => (unassigned) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed --

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2007-05-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
Unfortunately, license constraints prevent direct linking of the lame libraries with audacity. Version 1.3.2-3 includes an adjustment to improve the search for libmp3lame, which makes the manual configuration of mp3 support fairly simple for those with lame installed. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubu

[Bug 51063] Re: export to mp3 support missing (libmp3lame.so)

2007-05-20 Thread Emmet Hikory
Unfortunately, license constraints prevent direct linking of the lame libraries with audacity. Version 1.3.2-3 includes an adjustment to improve the search for libmp3lame, which makes the manual configuration of mp3 support fairly simple for those with lame installed. ** Changed in: audacity (Ubu