On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Connor Imes rocket2...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, that could be:
item
p
appSkype/app
/p
/item
Does this kind of spacing affect the on-disk size of our docs? I'm in favor
of this kind of spacing, and think we need to be consistent
Jim, it would just add some whitespace characters, the change in size
should be minimal. It is better to keep the source organized at the
expense of a few kilobytes than to be disorganized in order to save a
few kb.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Agreed. This should become part of our new styleguide and team wiki
pages.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510650
As for what the standard would be, I would like:
* 80 or 100 characters per line [1]
* Space indentation
* As many line breaks and line spaces as you dare
For example:
QUOTE
list
titleOther applications which support video calls include/title
itemp
appSkype/app
/p/item
I think we need to establish indent parameters, too. Should we use a
tab for indent, or a double space? I noticed that a lot of the gnome-
user-docs pages don't have any formatting, particularly in the top
sections of the document before it gets to the real material.
I also think that only the
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Standardize source formatting of ubuntu-docs source xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
