It's not as simple as that. Busybox's fsck applet is only the frontend
that calls filesystem-specific fsck implementations, and those
implementations are not included in Busybox (rightly so, IMO - I
wouldn't want to have to deal with data-loss bugs caused by skew between
the standard tools and
yeah! why this bug has not been considered?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512349
Title:
busybox: should have the fsck applet
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Definitely needed.
--
busybox: should have the fsck applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512349
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
