This bug was fixed in the package libunwind - 0.99-0.2ubuntu1
---
libunwind (0.99-0.2ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
* debian/rules:
+ adding -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE to CFLAGS to fix FTBFS on amd64 and i386
(Fix came from: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?28397),
LP: #52210
Steve, as far as I can trace the problem it appears to be in
src/setjmp/setjmp.c:
/* Why use K&R syntax here? setjmp() is often a macro and that
expands into a call to, say, __setjmp() and we need to define the
libunwind-version of setjmp() with the name of the actual function.
Using K&R
@Steve:
Ok, this was the "official" patch by upstream.
The other solution will be to not build libunwind-setjmp.so from source...which
was proposed by fedora (see first comment of me)
Regards,
\sh
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bu
Unsubscribing sponsors per the above.
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
The core of this patch is:
diff -u libunwind-0.99/debian/rules libunwind-0.99/debian/rules
--- libunwind-0.99/debian/rules
+++ libunwind-0.99/debian/rules
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
-CFLAGS = -Wall -g
+CFLAGS = -Wall -g -U_FORTIFY_
Moins,
simple non-intrusive patch for libunwind to compile cleanly.
rechecked with google-perftools and it works as expected.
Please sponsor ;)
Regards,
\sh
** Patch added: "libunwind_0.99-0.2ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49424584/libunwind_0.99-0.2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
libu
** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
If anybody is interested in, I put libunwind 0.99 without setjmp library
and google-perftools 1.5 (Jaunty, Karmic, Lucid) in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~csaba-kertesz/+archive/aiboplus
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notificati
** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Stephan Hermann (shermann) => (unassigned)
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Perftools does not depend on setjmp library so does not need to be built
for perftools.
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
Does this look like it will make it for lucid? as well as the blocking
google-perftools? Anything needing investigating or help with this?
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Tags added: patch-needswork
** Tags removed: patch
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
** Tags added: patch
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l
Unsubscribed.
--
libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Oh well, I missed that in my heat ;)
Ok, we can get rid of the -setjmp library I'm not sure if google-perftools
(which is my only known pkg which I know depends on libunwind) will use it at
all.
Further investigation...
can somone unsubscribe main sponsors, pls?
thx,
\sh
** Changed in: libunw
sorry, still FTBFS (amd64):
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libunwind-0.99'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
test -z "/usr/include" || /bin/mkdir -p
"/tmp/buildd/libunwind-0.99/debian/tmp/usr/include"
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 include/libunwind-x86_64.h
include/libun
** Summary changed:
- libunwind ftbfs on amd64
+ libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
** Attachment added: "debdiff including patch to fix ftbfs"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39212923/libunwind_0.99-0.2ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
libun
17 matches
Mail list logo
