[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Fix released in Lucid since Ubuntu-2.6.32-23.37 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 Title: ecryptfs

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

this seems not to be a UCK bug to me ** Changed in: uck Status: New => Won't Fix -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 567945 problems whit uck pakage manager -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 567945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567945 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 567945 problems whit uck pakage manager * You can subscribe to bug 567945 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/uck/+bug/567945/+subscribe --

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

** Also affects: uck Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Is this also a Problem on ntfs mounts? I ask this because I get in huge trouble on a hardy->lucid do-release-upgrade -m desktop -d, I think now due to a move of the /usr/share/doc to a ntfs partition because I had not enough space in /usr for the upgrade. I symlinked the doc-folder on the ntfs p

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Indeed, that's how I noticed this problem. UCK does not work on eCryptfs homedirs... -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Users of UbuntuCustomizationKit with "encrypted home" might have similar problems. Bug #567945 eventually could be a duplicate of this bug. -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

This is still a problem in Lucid-rc -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3a60a1686f0d51c99bd0df8ac93050fb6dfce647 has been queued for 2.6.32 stable updates and will be picked up in Lucid in due course. -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

So this should be fixed in Ubuntu Maverick (or if we cherrypick this fix from -stable) for Lucid. -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

I pushed a fix for this into 2.6.34-rc5 and cc'ed stable: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3a60a1686f0d51c99bd0df8ac93050fb6dfce647 ** Changed in: ecryptfs Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption http

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

** Changed in: ecryptfs Status: Triaged => In Progress -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

I'm affected by this in Ubuntu Karmic. I run scratchbox in an encrypted partitions, and dpkg 1.15.5.5+maemo3+0m6 fails with the same error. I run ecryptfs 81-0ubuntu3. -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You receive

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

** Tags added: kernel-series-unknown -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Is anybody working on a patch already? I've just been hit by this issue as well. My poor workaround is to run the debootstrap in /tmp. -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

** Also affects: ecryptfs Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ecryptfs Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ecryptfs Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ecryptfs Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink

Re: [Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

On 02/26/2010 02:58 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Wouldn't it make more sense to consistently return unencrypted > sizes/metadata for all syscalls on ecryptfs files? I agree with you. I think it is reasonable to check if the file is a symlink and then attempt to decrypt the target. If that's successf

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Yes, I was running it fine a couple days of earlier, but we did get a dpkg update on 14 Feb. The assert was committed on Sep 2009 in dpkg: - do { -varbufextend(&symlinkfn); -r= readlink(fnamevb.buf,symlinkfn.buf,symlinkfn.size); -if (r<0) ohshite(_("unable to read link

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

I don't believe this is a regression caused by the fix in bug #390833. The only change that fix made was to the st_blocks field of the stat struct. The problem that Loïc is seeing is that return value of readlink() and st_size don't match. As far as I can tell, that has always been the case since

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

Argh, what a mess... Well, bug #390833 has a work around, albeit inconvenient. ie, users must use du --apparent-size ... I'm CC'ing Tyler here, since he's the author of the upstream patch and will want to know about this. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Confirmed --

[Bug 524919] Re: ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption

I think the regression was caused by the fix for bug #390833. -- ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu