** Changed in: gcc
Importance: Unknown => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
Title:
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
To manage notifications about this
fixed both in fsf 4.4 and in the Ubuntu package
--
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Did you mean the patch is now in lucid or not? (I'm confused now...)
The backport appears sensible to me, but I'll try to get some compiler
guru feedback.
--
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
You received this bug notification because you ar
Hmm sorry, I had checked the debian/patches/arm*, but didn't see it.
Thanks
--
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
that is already fixed in lucid
** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: gcc
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
@Dave Martin: Mind checking whether it's ok to pull this patch in the
lucid toolchain? Thanks!
--
[PR40887] Backport indirection function call opt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I forgot to note: this was actually recommended by x264 upstream
developer David Conrad, thanks!
** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #40887
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40887
** Also affects: gcc via
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40887
Importance: Unknown
