I'll mark this as "rejected", since it "works as intented".
Thank you for your report - it's technically correct.
But there is no proper way to fix this unless the output is wider (as
per the attached patch) or we add an extra line for that - both
solutions would be ugly.
Regards,
Yves
** Chang
Hi,
This patch would fix the problem. I don't like it, because the output is
now wider and won't fit in a console window, even after decreasing the
space between columns.
IMO this should be rejected. Do you agree, Danny?
Regards,
Yves
** Attachment added: "change the placement of the "cached" e
Hi Danny,
Thank you for your report. I can confirm this on both Debian Etch and
Ubuntu Feisty.
The data itself is correct. It reflects the "Cached" information from
/proc/meminfo. But since top prepends that line with "Swap:", one would
guess that's swap related, where it isn't.
On the other han
Same behaviour with 2.6.15-23-386 and 2.6.12-10-386, so I guess it was not due
to recent update.
Maybe this is just a 2.4.x.->2.6.x discrepency I never noticed before.
(yeah, confirmed same bug on co-workers gentoo box and random person in
[EMAIL PROTECTED], definately an upstream bug in how proc
