Tested on armel, works as expected. Powerpc data looks ok in the source
tree. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fails to work on ports architect
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/command-not-found/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fails to work on ports architectures
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
This bug was fixed in the package command-not-found - 0.2.41ubuntu1
---
command-not-found (0.2.41ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
* updated to current natty
* updated to include ports.ubuntu.com as well in the scan.data
set (LP: #533031)
-- Michael VogtTue, 05 Apr 2011 14:15:1
This is uploaded now. I have not tested it on powerpc, armel as I don't
have the required hardware. Feedback welcome.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fa
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu Natty)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.04-beta-1 => ubuntu-11.04-beta-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fails to work
Just for the record, this is blocked on getting access to a mirror of
ports.ubuntu.com to run the data extraction on.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fa
Hm? Not sure that this is really "bitesize".
** Tags removed: bitesize
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fails to work on ports architectures
--
ubuntu
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: Tobin Davis (gruemaster) => Michael Vogt (mvo)
** Tags added: bitesize
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
com
** Also affects: command-not-found (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Tobin Davis (gruemaster)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
co
The problem here is just that the extractor runs on a machine without
access to a ports.ubuntu.com mirror. If that gets fixed the extraction
can include them. Alternativelyit could run on two different machines
and we just concat the result on build time. But I want to run it on a
ubuntu hosted ser
After spending a weekend learning python-apt and all it's nuances, then
updating the code within the command-not-found source tree for
generating the scan.data used to generate the data files at build time,
I now have a working database on armel. Need to redo my hacks so that
they can be integrate
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Title:
command-not-found fails to work on ports architectures
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
I can still reproduce this issue on natty images.
Steps to reproduce:
~$ sudo apt-get remove strace
~$ strace
Expected results should be:
The program 'strace' is currently not installed. You can install it by
typing:
sudo apt-get install strace
Actual results:
No command
Emmet: what are you talking about? Command not found has an database of
suggestions that has to be generated offline by having access to all the
.deb files you want to support. It is not using Contents.gz file
(whatever that is) as far as I know.
--
command-not-found fails to work on ports archit
The issue is much simpler than that: the Contents.gz files are
generated on ports.ubuntu.com, command-not-found just isn't looking
there.
--
command-not-found fails to work on ports architectures
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Hmm, this is very odd.
Unless someone broke the data harvester around lucid I cannot explain how this
could happen.
Michael Vogt: is the data generated on a host that has access to port
packages?
--
command-not-found fails to work on ports architectures
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
Yo
I can reproduce this as well. Other examples that are easy to reproduce
(since strace is installed by default on my system): abiword, konsole,
etc...
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
Further testing indicates that command-not-found does work on ports, but
only for arch:all packages. This can lead to odd results, like the
following (lucid armel):
No command 'strace' found, did you mean:
Command 'dtrace' from package 'systemtap-sdt-dev' (universe)
--
command-not-found fails t
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40286768/Dependencies.txt
** Tags added: armel ia64 sparc
--
command-not-found fails to work on ports architectures
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533031
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
19 matches
Mail list logo
