** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/chromium-codecs-ffmpeg
--
[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
thank you very much for this!
--
[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
renamed -extra but i need to keep a transitional package for the tens
of thousands of users who already got it through the PPAs.
--
[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I very much dislike the idea to get a copy of ffmpeg in. At the very
least, I'd like to hear an explicit ok from the security team.
--
[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
If we don't ship it, tech users will grab it from one of the PPAs, and
worse, the vast majority of ubuntu users will just stop using Chromium
the first time they hit a video and move to the upstream Google Chrome
deb which ships the whole thing by default.
BTW, it's not a copy of ffmpeg per say,
I very much dislike the idea to get a copy of ffmpeg in. At the very least,
I'd like to hear an explicit ok from the security team.
The security concern feels more like a MIR topic than a motu-release
one. The risk for getting release critical bugs is definitly low as we
are using this
security is a concern for universe as well, and is my main concern.
I've talked to Reinhard (ffmpeg upstream) now, and he told me that security is
well maintained for Google's branch.
Also I've been told that the -mt branch will get merged to ffmpeg main at some
point, but most probably not for
i meant it as non-royalty-free / non-patent-free, so users know what they
may face.
I can use restricted, but i don't like extra as it has a positive aspect.
--
[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537617
You received this bug notification because you are a
Of course it has an positive aspect because after all, it does offer
extra functionality. Our users are not going to be charged for using it.
The risk is on the distributors side. I strongly oppose package names
that indicate ffmpeg would produce non-free or crippled code.
As for security
10 matches
Mail list logo
