[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-21 Thread Divius
BTW, I've packaged 2.11.3, maybe somebody test it? https://launchpad.net/~divius/+archive/ppa -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gthumb - 3:2.11.2.1.is.2.10.11-0ubuntu1 --- gthumb (3:2.11.2.1.is.2.10.11-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Revert to 2.10.11. It appears that 2.11.x series is not stable enough for an LTS with too many big changes. The new workflow isn't

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-05 Thread William Shotts
In version 2.11.2.1 (Lucid) the keyboard shortcuts for image rotation in fullscreen mode (e, r, m) are not working. I agree that this version is very slow compared to past versions especially when loading large images and viewing directories containing large numbers ( 4000) of images. --

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-05 Thread William Shotts
Also the Help menu lacks a Report a Problem... entry. -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-02 Thread Matthias Hawran
Michael Chudobiak wrote on 2010-03-25: The import dialog does have an event field. This can be used with the custom folder option to automatically create a destination folder with that name (or a combination of the name and date, like /home/ bill/2010-01-01_wedding). It is not properly

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-02 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Nice to hear that some issues have been resolved in upstream GIT. Should a new tarball be released then? We're running out of time to decide on whether to stick with 2.11 or revert to 2.10 for Lucid. -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545871 You received this bug

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-02 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
It would be desirable to document what usage the Event and Tags fields have. Right now, I was under the assumption that they could be used e.g. as a variable to affect part of the folder name but, seeing the above, it appears that it only affects the catalog feature's own keyword database.

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-04-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Two of the four bugs have already been fixed in upstream git, and the others got great responses, so I don't think it's still a release blocker. ** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High = Medium -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545871 You

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Michael, thanks for following up. So it seems that at least you do _not_ consider 2.11 an experimental development snapshot which you wouldn't like to see shipped? Michael Chudobiak [2010-03-24 13:47 -]: 1. The import folder is specified in the Preferences button of the import

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-25 Thread Michael Chudobiak
Martin, The 2.11.x codebase has been quite good (i.e., reasonably crash-free), so I think the bleeding-edge distros should ship it. (LTS is not bleeding edge, of course.) I'm not that happy with the import dialog either. I would like the destination settings to be in the main import dialog.

Re: [Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Michael Chudobiak [2010-03-25 10:08 -]: The import dialog does have an event field. This can be used with the custom folder option to automatically create a destination folder with that name (or a combination of the name and date, like /home/bill/2010-01-01_wedding). It is not properly

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Martin-Eric, you had the biggest concerns with that yesterday, can you elaborate? Thanks! -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Martin Pitt
I just tried importing from my gphoto camera. 2.11 showed quite a lot of bugs and regression slike - it doesn't allow you to select a target folder straight away any more - switching off the camera doesn't remove the device from gphoto - multiple selection with shift is broken (it doesnt

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Michael Chudobiak
1. The import folder is specified in the Preferences button of the import dialog. Not a bug :-) 2. Camera off - not sure about that. Please file a bug upstream. 3. Multiple select - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610419. I'm not sure if/how that will be resolved. 4. Drag to folders

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
1. Destination folder preferences are a real mess. As much as I tried fiddling with the preferences, I could not reproduce the folder naming logic of 2.10. Anyhow, preferences should be found under the Preferences menu, not hidden somewhere else. 2. I've noticed this too. 3. I've noticed this

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Michael Chudobiak
OK, it sounds like 2.10.x is what you need for LTS then. On a side note, the picture editing functions are NOT gone in 2.11.2.1: 1. Enable Image Tools in the EditExtensions dialog, if not already enabled. 2. When you open an image, click on the palette icon in the upper left (Edit file tooltip)

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Expecting someone to go back and enable what used to be there by default is generally not a good strategy, neither is fragmenting existing functions into plug-ins. By all means, do add the ability to make plug- ins if you like, but fragmenting features and moving them around just for the sake of

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Michael Chudobiak
Was that plug-in not enabled by default for you? It is supposed to be. The entire codebase has been re-written. Most features are now implemented as plug-ins. Most are supposed to be enabled by default. Change happens! - Mike -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

[Bug 545871] Re: [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10

2010-03-24 Thread Michael Chudobiak
What crashes is 2.11 introducing? 2.11.2.1 is not particularly crash prone. It is currently missing the web album exporter, however. 2.10.x is not being maintained at all. - Mike -- [lucid] downgrade to stable 2.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545871 You received this bug notification