Sorry for the confusion, guys. I have been quite heavily using OOo and MS Word 2003 in parallel for a few weeks now (for several reasons). I could have sworn that the fonts look nicer in Word. When I was trying to prove it doing some snapshots, I found they practically look the same (see screenshot)! Now I am puzzled why that is. I actually am shocked facing the possibility that I may be positively biased for MS product... One difference may be that on my current settings, I have the minimal size for the AA in OOo to "1", whereas the AA seems to be switched off in my wine/MS Word settings for the smaller fonts. That may have caused my impression. Similarly, in my snapshot, the menus in Word are not AA'ed at all, whereas OOo does its not-so-perfect AA. I actually prefer no AA at all in that case! --hasi.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing font rendering" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10280644/OOo%20--%20MS%20Word.png -- font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
