[Expired for parted (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548792
Same problem here with a Intel X-25M G2 160 GB SSD.
Fresh install of Kubuntu 10.04
r...@pc2010:/# cat /sys/block/sda/alignment_offset
0
r...@pc2010:/# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/minimum_io_size
512
r...@pc2010:/# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/optimal_io_size
0
r...@pc2010:/# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/phys
I assume you advised to run all the commands on the SATA drive (WD15EARS) with
the 4K sectors?
That's what I did. My drives have been rearranged, the WD15EARS is now sdc
This is using Lucid daily build 04-APR-2010
r...@ubuntu:~# cat /sys/block/sdc/alignment_offset
0
r...@ubuntu:~#
r...@ubuntu:
I'll upload those tonight. Thanks for your efforts.
--
parted fails to report partition alignment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
Oh, and also:
sudo parted -m -s /dev/sda print
sudo fdisk -clu /dev/sda
--
parted fails to report partition alignment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Don, please attach the following files:
/sys/block/sde/alignment_offset
/sys/block/sde/queue/minimum_io_size
/sys/block/sde/queue/optimal_io_size
/sys/block/sde/queue/physical_block_size
** Changed in: parted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
parted fails to report partition
No problem. My concern is that parted v 2.2 (included in Lucid) states
this capability, and that some user will have a botched installation on
a 4K sector HD or SSD. Once parted really supports the "align-check",
then it should be easy to code up a script for the install.
--
parted fails to rep
Reassigning to parted since this does not have anything to do with
e2fsprogs. I have the same drive and it appears that the problem is due
to the drive lieing about its sector size. It reports that it uses 512
byte sectors instead of 4kb to the kernel, and parted uses the
information that the ker