This problem also persists in Ubuntu 11.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
Title:
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does
not display crisply
To
The problem remains in 11.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
Title:
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does
not display crisply
To manage
The softpedia workaround works for me using proprietary Nvidia drivers,
BUT when I hibernate my machine, it won't come resume - it just hangs.
Not sure if this reported as another bug or not, but some googling has
indicated that using uvesafb with the proprietary nvidia drivers can
cause
The workaround works fine with Kubuntu Maverick Meerkat (10.10). I just
can't understand why there's no fix if a workaround is already out, so,
the problem AND solution is already known.
When I try to show Kubuntu (or Ubuntu) to a Windows user, the first
thing they notice is the UGLY boot... :(
I'm on 10.10 and I am using the proprietary fglrx driver for my
Radeon3100. I have an ugly splash screen, ugly boot messages and ugly
console screens. So nothing happened, as far as I can see, to this in
Meerkat. I've tried modifying /etc/default/grub setting GRUB_GFXMODE and
IMO this isn't fixed until the resolutions can match up, I get a
flickery purple screen with text on 10.10. This is not a good user
experience. I don't see why users should be punished for having good
graphics cards when my wife's ubuntu has a generic Intel based and it
looks great. Windows 7
Im not sure what Fixed is meant to look like. :(
I found a nice Windows 7 Plymouth screen and it simply looks like a huge
eyesore with 4-bit color.
I haven't tried the Softpedia workaround yet...lil hesitant, don't want
to break anything. Cant it be included in 10.10?
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb
The Softpedia workaround fix worked for me.
Don't know *WHY* this is marked as Fix Released.
I have 10.04.1 from a fresh install and updates done, and this bug was still
coming up.
(The remaster for 10.04.1 was released days after this fix).
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx
This bug report tracks the *color map* issues when displaying on a VGA
framebuffer. That issue has been fixed. The size of the logo is a
different issue, tracked as a separate bug (bug #563878)
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
i don't know how to actually status should be but for me this fix
didn't help
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Invalid
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Fix Released
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
It mans this is not the right place to track whatever remaining issues
you're having with nvidia cards.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The fix didn't fix fully the problem on kubuntu 10.04 64bit. Now the screen is
at 1024*768 (or something similar), but it still ugly on a 1440*900 panel for
example.
I think that manual workaround cannot be considered a solution for the mass
public, which can fix it only through an official
I didn't get any fix. there's nothing in the updares.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Scott James Remnant (scott) = (unassigned)
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Steve, does this mean there is no need to use the softpedia solution
(http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-Plymouth-
Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml) anymore? NVIDIA cards now work dandy
with plymouth?
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers)
@Tomas Šaduikis
Sorry man, i type and forgot to translate to english... but i said:
I tried a lot of resolutions but none of them was good in all, the logo
of 10:04 did not show up correctly and the displayed text (UBUNTU 10.04)
were defective. : (
Yesterday I reinstalled the system and started
Sorry, Rafael I dont understand your language, I'm lithuanian ;)
theres no need to use the softpedia method if you have 1280x1024 or less
monitor. all you have to do is this:
GRUB_GFXMODE=1280x1024
GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=1280x1024
I use it on my 1920x1080 monitor and it looks quite good. the TTY's
also to show it longer it's needed to add FRAMEBUFFER=y to
/etc/initrams-tools/conf.d/splash
then:
sudo update-grub2
and:
sudo update-initramfs -u
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this
Recently at a Softpedia blog I read about the solution, which works fine with
nice glossy view!
http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-Plymouth-Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml
But at last I would like it more if Canonical itself solves this
resolution issue :)
--
@Rafael Passos de Oliveira
same for me with native 1920x1080 on 22'. best that works for me is
1280x1024x24 with the softpedia method. also to show it properly centered I
need manualy change the horizontal position while booting.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Tomas Šaduikis tomas.sadui...@gmail.com wrote:
@Rafael Passos de Oliveira
same for me with native 1920x1080 on 22'. best that works for me is
1280x1024x24 with the softpedia method. also to show it properly centered I
need manualy change the horizontal
ctrl+alt+F1 and so on work good
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
ermmm. I don't know, never checked it. how to check it?
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Tomas Šaduikis
Eu tentei um monte de resoluções mas nenhuma delas ficou boa, todas a
logo do 10.04 não aparecia e as letras UBUNTU 10.04 ficavam defeituosas.
:(
@Julián Alarcón
It did not work for me. The TTY is all bad, you can not see anything on
the screen. But I do not use it much, I am a
I tried the http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-
Plymouth-Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml solution and it worked for me
=D
But I must say, the default ubuntu driver was able to display plymouth
at a higher resolution (it seemed like 1920x1200) than the measly
1280x1020
here's what I do:
1. sudo apt-get install hwinfo
2. sudo hwinfo --framebuffer
3. I get something like this:
Mode 0x031b: 1280x1024 (+5120), 24 bits
4. Then I pick my desired resolution and:
sudo gedit /etc/default/grub
and add the desired mode into this line:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=
like this:
** Attachment added: 1620x1200 booting with vga=0x034a mode
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47934816/img_1463.jpg
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: 1600x1200 shutdown with vga=0x034a mode
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47934929/img_1462.jpg
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you
Affects me too...
My video card is a 9800 GT XFX on 1920X1080 23' Screen. When this ugly
bug will be fixed?
I tried the http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-
Plymouth-Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml solution and not work for
me...
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with
Exact same problem here using the non-free ATI Driver. On a fresh
install everything is perfect until i install the ATI Drivers.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification
This bug and Bug #553854 are duplicates of each other, but I have no
problem with ignoring this bug. Resolution of the underlying problem is
all that is important to me, not the organization or interpretation of
duplicates. The only reason I focused on this bug rather than another
duplicate was
The Canonical folks believe they have delivered a fix to the title of
this bug. Let's let this one lie.
I corrected the erroneous linking of my bug as a duplicate of this bug.
Now, it is its own bug. If you are affected by plymouth's poor choice
of resolution when using a proprietary display
This problem occurred for me, but I found a very good solution which I
hope will be pushed upstream. The changes should be applied when
proprietary graphics drivers are enabled and reverted when proprietary
graphics are disabled. One of the steps involves choosing the ideal
resolution for the
By pushed upstream, I mean applied to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Changed the status to confirmed because the bug has not been fixed as of
the final release of Ubuntu 10.4 and there are countless reports of this
bug on Launchpad and all over the Internet. Please commit a proper fix.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not
Here is the same solution targeted at Linux beginners.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-Plymouth-
Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml
Countless Ubuntu users enable a proprietary graphics driver when the hardware
drivers notification icon first appears right after logging
Hmph, they remediate my guide without even credit me by at least by
linking to my original post. Not a fair act to me by Softpedia.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug
That's Softpedia...
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Same here, on a 64-bit system, fresh install (upgraded from 9.04 and then did
fresh install to test if it solves the issue). No splash screen appears after
GRUB selection. A long black screen, only during the late stages of which the
hard drive can be heard doing anything.
Intel Core Two Duo
sanctimon, it sounds like you are experiencing Bug #516958 which looks
like it is awaiting more detailed user feedback. If you can manage it, I
recommend you attach a picture of the three Ubuntu logos to that bug.
Also post which version of plymouth you have installed, then subscribe
to the bug so
This bug report is about the *crispness* of the logo. That has been
fixed. Do not reopen this report.
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
It has not been fixed. It is not 'crisp' as of the final release of
Ubuntu 10.4. It can never be 'crisp' so long as the wrong resolution is
being used when the logo is being used.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
Steve, or someone with equal or more authority, please reopen this bug
report.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I submitted my disagreement about the resolution of this bug as a
launchpad question.
https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/109331
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug
This bug, i believe, effects both ATI and Nvidia. On my system, I also
get same problem w/o ATi driver.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Yes I have an ATI Mobility Radeon X300 with the privative driver installed
and I hve this bug.
2010/4/30 kahrytan kahry...@hawaiiantel.net
This bug, i believe, effects both ATI and Nvidia. On my system, I also
get same problem w/o ATi driver.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or
I installed with a brand new ATI 5870 today and saw the same horrible
screen. :\
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
@Steve Langasek:
OK, my bad about my comments on this bug... they are all related, like
Jason Wagner said, so...
Anyway, I don't understand how can Canonical leave such as nasty bug in
a LTS release!? Really! It's unacceptable if you ask me... Every Lucid
user with Nvidia and ATI graphics cards
Because it serves as a reminder of why closed source drivers are bad ;-)
RMS would be proud.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
NOTHING was fixed! The bug is still there, at least on today's (April
26th) daily ISO build. Tested by me on different Nvidia systems (7300
GT, 7300 GS, FX 5500, FX 5200). Plymouth looks like crap with the Nvidia
(and probably ATI) proprietary video drivers! Please do NOT leave this
bug in the
This bug report is Ubuntu logo does not display crisply. That bug
most certainly has been fixed, I have personally verified it.
If your objection is actually that the logo is *oversized*, that's bug
#563878, which will not be resolved for the final release.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with
Steve, why then are all of these bugs linked to this bug as duplicates?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsplash/+bug/551196
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/552980
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/553656
All that has been achieved so far is the logo looks slightly less
terrible when plymouth chooses the worst possible video mode. That
might be acceptable if Lucid is going to ship with this bug still open,
but it does not resolve the bug.
plymouth to display the splash screen in our native
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 19:01 +, Jason Wagner wrote:
plymouth to display the splash screen in our native resolutions with
full color depth when using proprietary drivers, as it does when we
disable the proprietary drivers.
We don't have the source to the proprietary drivers, so we can't
I am a bit perplexed uvesafb and efifb (shipped with grub2 and
activated quite simply) work well with nvidia, radeon and nouveaux (I
don't know about all models or ATI propriety). So couldn't the fb from
either of these be used or parts of the code to either patch or replace
the vga16fb at least
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 23:40 +, mabawsa wrote:
I am a bit perplexed uvesafb and efifb (shipped with grub2 and
activated quite simply) work well with nvidia, radeon and nouveaux (I
don't know about all models or ATI propriety). So couldn't the fb from
either of these be used or parts of
Thanks Scott,
Damn I never realised the code name had been released Maverick Meerkat.
Sticking with higher animals I see. Maybe we will have to wait for
Yabbling Yeast till we see something a bit lower.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
Is not fix. We have in lucid plymouth 8.2-2 but the problem still exist.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Yes it happens to me too on nVidia GForce 9400M GS
2010/4/25 vista killer chek2f...@gmail.com
Is not fix. We have in lucid plymouth 8.2-2 but the problem still exist.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not
display crisply
please also be aware of bug 569960 for the fact that the password prompt
on the new artwork is cut off horizontally and vertically, making it
difficult to observe password entry.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
New 16-color artwork committed
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott James Remnant (scott)
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.04
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as
This bug was fixed in the package plymouth - 0.8.2-1
---
plymouth (0.8.2-1) lucid; urgency=low
[ Steve Langasek ]
* New upstream release.
* debian/plymouth.plymouth-stop.upstart: trust the new kdm to stop plymouth
for us, too. LP: #540177.
* plymouth needs to depend on
mabawsa, thanks for your reply!
Now I found my way trough this...
First I blacklisted vga16fb, and then uvesafb started working but sadly loaded
after plymouth, so I seen the text mode splash on a high res terminal at the
top-left corner... then I removed uvesafb from the modules file, and put
The ugliness has only just begun, as we have started to change the
packages. Normally, plymouth falls back to a text-mode when a
proprietary driver is installed, and this is much better than, if all
users get a lower nice bootscreen.
PLEASE SIMLPY GET BACK TO THIS PREVIOUS BEHAVIOUR AND ALL ARE
OK after reading the uvesafb manual I came up with this rather simple
workaround that makes my boot experience much better, still a bit jumpy.
sudo gedit /etc/initramfs-tools
add:
uvesafb mode_option=1280x800-32 mtrr=3 scroll=ywrap
obviously changing your resolution to what you want then:
sudo
Oh I got nice hires ttys as well. The set gfxpayload=keep workaround
borked my ttys.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
oopa made a mistake:
-sudo gedit /etc/initramfs-tools
+sudo gedit /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
sorry
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Also before I started I had v86d installed which is apparently
essential,
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thanks, mabawsa! This workaround worked for me with nVidia GeForce 8400M
GS on Dell Inspiron 1520!
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
afunix, did you do any special steps? I have the same gpu in my vostro
1310 and I can't get it work with uvesafb :(
i installed v86b too...
On 04/10/2010 09:07 PM, afunix wrote:
Thanks, mabawsa! This workaround worked for me with nVidia GeForce 8400M
GS on Dell Inspiron 1520!
--
u-foka
Strange as this is the same GPU to my one (can you run the following command to
make sure?)
~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G86 [GeForce 8400M GS]
(rev a1)
What kind of boot experience do you get?
Did you alter any of the grub files? if so you
I would second 3vi1' workaround. Better off with no splash than the
horrid purplish blob I see on a GeForce 7300M powered laptop. 640x480 is
really ugly when upscaled to 1440x900 (17 laptop)
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
I allso agree with OlivierP. Especially when KArmic looked pretty nice,
then lucid should not be ugly.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
If lucid ships with this bug open, perhaps we should consider putting
users on affected drivers on usplash with a comparable logo, and then
roll everyone over to plymouth once the bug is confirmed resolved? Or
is that too drastic of a change post-release?
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with
usplash isn't even remotely suitable as a substitute for plymouth in
Lucid.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Black is better than ugly. Plain text if the disk is being checked. It
should also be on the release notes that this is a won't fixer.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug
Ok, I understand. You're doing a good work. Then I think the better soluiton
is use a plymouth image with less coor depth, then the nvidia cards with the
propietary driver will draw it properly.
2010/4/8 wavded wav...@gmail.com
Disabling brought the resolution up for the bootscreen. I have to
I found this bug because I thought my card might be defective, but I see
this is the 'norm'.
If something isn't done to alleviate the ugly appearance, I predict
there will be a lot of new Kubuntu users opening tickets here next month
for broken bootsplash screens.
I'm going to see if I can
Just disable the proprietary drivers.
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This solution is not very useful if you need 3D acceleration.
I insist, maybe a solution could be that.
1. The default drivers for nvidia cards are nouveau.
2. if you want 3d acceleration you install the propietary drivers.
3. When you install the propietary drivers form the repositories the
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:29:09PM -, opengeek wrote:
This solution is not very useful if you need 3D acceleration.
I insist, maybe a solution could be that.
1. The default drivers for nvidia cards are nouveau.
2. if you want 3d acceleration you install the propietary drivers.
3. When you
opengeek, Tesselode was assisting wavded. He was not insisting that the
solution is not to use proprietary drivers.
I'm pretty sure using nouveau with plymouth and the proprietary driver
under X is not possible. Even if it were, it would still break the
seamless transition, which AFAIK, is the
My god :(
Who the hell cares about KMS, i know, i know it's a good thing, I agree,
but can not compared to have a good looking boot with an accelerated
X... and a switch in a second between the two... Nowdays, the mayoralty
of users have lcd displays, where the native resolution much more
Disabling brought the resolution up for the bootscreen. I have to agree
w/ what's being said, it unfortunate that the proprietary drivers look a
like a joke in the splash when it seems like they could be harnessed for
more, better resolution, 3d something. But I have no knowledge of how
the
** Summary changed:
- ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia binary drivers) does not display crisply
+ ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not
display crisply
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
I'm interested in just running the Nuveau drivers to fix this issue and
see how the system performs. Is there any tutorial on how to do that?
Do I disable Compiz?
--
ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display
crisply
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013
92 matches
Mail list logo
