[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-12-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package sudo - 1.7.2p1-1ubuntu5.5 --- sudo (1.7.2p1-1ubuntu5.5) lucid-proposed; urgency=low * toke.{cl}: avoid duplicate fclose() of the sudoers file (LP: #553786) - http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/164d39108dde -- Marc DeslauriersThu, 22 Nov 2012

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-12-17 Thread Bartosz Kosiorek
After installing sudo package from proposed, there is no longer crash: sudo ls sudo: /etc/sudoers.d/mama is mode 0644, should be 0440 >>> /etc/sudoers.d/README: /etc/sudoers.d/mama near line 18 <<< sudo: parse error in /etc/sudoers.d/README near line 18 sudo: no valid sudoers sources found, quitti

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-11-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/sudo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553786 Title: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption To manage notifications about this

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-11-26 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted sudo into lucid-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/1.7.2p1-1ubuntu5.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-11-22 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: sudo + [SRU] - Lucid beta1, sudo 1.7.2p1-1ubuntu4. I added a file with incorrect - permissions under /etc/sudoers.d/, and while that needed fixing, sudo(8) - certainly shouldn't react like this: + [Impact] + Lucid users who create a file in /etc/su

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-11-22 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Upstream fix: http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/164d39108dde ** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-11-22 Thread Rüdiger Kupper
I have been hit by this bug and it's *extremely nasty*. I am instantly locked out of my system with no way of fixing it. Things like these MUST NOT happen. I get from this bugreport that there is a fix. BACKPORT THIS FIX TO LUCID! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-04-16 Thread Jason R. Coombs
Has Ubuntu changed its meaning of LTS? This issue still exists in Lucid. Keith Baker already pointed out that the issue was fixed at least as early as Natty. Can we get the fix back-ported to Lucid? Is there any reason this shouldn't be considered critical as it can lock out legitimate administrat

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-04-15 Thread Steve Langasek
This bug appears to be fixed in precise. A message is output about the wrong permissions, but sudo itself works correctly. ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-03-23 Thread Jason R. Coombs
I've just been bitten by this bug yet again. I've had to request to my administrator to reboot our server into recovery mode to remove the file. Why isn't a bug that locks administrators out of the operating system (in an otherwise well-configured environment) not considered a critical bug? The onl

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-01-29 Thread Keith Baker
Just happened to me on a fresh and updated lucid server installation. This is really annoying since the server was a plain router. No keyboard or monitor was connected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-01-29 Thread Keith Baker
Tried same thing on desktop version of natty. There the problem seems fixed. Still I'd consider this bug critical since lucid is the current long- term-support version. ** Tags added: lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2012-01-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553786 Title: *** gl

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2011-07-18 Thread Carlos Perelló Marín
How do you change the file rights if sudo doesn't work nor you have a root password set nor you have direct access to the server to reboot into single mode? IMHO, this bug should be set as CRITICAL, given that you are "banned" from administrate a remote server. -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 553786] Re: *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption

2010-11-04 Thread Ovidiu Constantin
Confirmed also on Ubuntu 10.4 - 1.7.2p1-1ubuntu5.2 . Changing the file rights from 644 to 440 "fixed" it. -- *** glibc detected *** sudo: double free or corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe