This bug still exists in 12.04.5 LTS, which is supported until April
2017.
My package version is 4.20-1.1ubuntu1 and no update to mentioned
4.20-1.1ubuntu6 is available from Canonical’s sources.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: Ubuntu Precise
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notificat
** Package changed: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications about this bu
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
T
This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 4.20-1.1ubuntu7
---
memtest86+ (4.20-1.1ubuntu7) trusty; urgency=low
* Revert to using linux16 memtest image when using serial console. As
knetbsd + elf + serial console does not work. (LP: #560839)
-- Dave ChilukThu, 06 Mar 20
** Also affects: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Chiluk (chiluk)
--
You received this bug notifica
Here's a patch that only reverts the serial console changes.
** Attachment added: "lp560839.trusty.revertdebdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/4009279/+files/lp560839.trusty.revertdebdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I just confirmed with trust.
Loading memtest with
> knetbsd /boot/memtest86+.elf console=ttyS0,115200n8
Ignores the serial console option.
Loading memtest with
> linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin console=ttyS0,115200n8
Works, but the above issue would still exist on some machines.
Loading memt
So I got a report that this change has regressed console memtest86+. I
have verified that precise package in my ppa does indeed cause the
regression on the serial console menuentry. I'm installing trusty on my
testbed that has a serial port now, to verify there.
Also as an aside, I tested runnin
It is and it will. It's just getting time to bake in 14.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications ab
> This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 4.20-1.1ubuntu6
> In Progress → Fix Released
Why it's not fixed in Ubuntu 12.04 ? Is 12.04 not supported anymore?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
This should fix LP: #19885 as well. Unfortunately I don't think I have
still have any machines that exhibit that problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too smal
This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 4.20-1.1ubuntu6
---
memtest86+ (4.20-1.1ubuntu6) trusty; urgency=low
[ Rajeev V. Pillai ]
* Use ELF memtest86+ binary and load into high memory. This solves the error
"error: too small lower memory" with certain bioses. (LP: #5608
no comment
** Patch removed: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/3922491/+files/lp560839.trusty.debdiff
** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attach
Fixed debdiff so that grub menu entries are not modified to specify elf.
** Patch removed: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/3922489/+files/lp560839.trusty.debdiff
** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.l
fixed per feedback from infinity
** Patch removed: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/3922423/+files/lp560839.trusty.debdiff
** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+
I'm uploading a trusty debdiff. At this point no one that has tried the
PPA has found an issue with it. So I think the next steps should be to
upload the fix to trusty, let it bake for a while, and then sru the
solution back from there.
** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.
Dave, since you say you're still waiting for feedback before pushing,
I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Please resubscribe them when this is
ready for upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I tested this on a problematic machine (triggering the relocation error)
with an Award BIOS from a Gigabyte P55A-UD3 motherboard with 4x2048MiB
of RAM and the memory was correctly detected and the memtest run
started; thanks for working on this!
I was using the multiboot version previously, which
works for me on Ubuntu 13.04
Intel® Core™ i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz × 4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notificati
Works for me, Gigabyte / Intel core i5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
I just tested the PPA posted by Dave Chiluk for memtest86+ on Saucy, and
I was able to run the full test without the "too small lower memory"
error. My computer is a Toshiba A205 laptop, Intel GM965/GL960 chipset.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Tested in saucy, as reported at #44, ppa works fine. (Asrock bios, if it
matters)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To ma
@Kristian et al
As this is a pretty drastic change with potential of breaking MANY people, I'm
waiting for quite a few people letting me know the PPA in #39 has fixed the
issue before I push on getting this into the mainstream codebase.
Also when testing please let me know which series you tes
I'm having same issue. When will this be integrated upstream?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications a
I too tested the patch for saucy and I can confirm that it fixed the
problem. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
T
I tested the proposed ppa: it works and solves the issue of running
memtest86+ from the local hard disk at boot time.
Good job.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: to
The attachment "lp560839.precise.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The
ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they
can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, a
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage noti
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Chiluk (chiluk)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
** Patch added: "lp560839.raring.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/357/+files/lp560839.raring.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Patch added: "lp560839.saucy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/368/+files/lp560839.saucy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Patch added: "lp560839.quantal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/356/+files/lp560839.quantal.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
I just created a ppa for memtest that changes the default memtest to the elf
binary , and loads it at 0x10. Can the people on this thread please test
the ppa available at the below link and report back.
https://launchpad.net/~chiluk/+archive/lp560839
As I do not have any machines that fai
Forgot to say that I'm using Memtest 4.20.1.1ubuntu1 (latest verion
available from the repos AFAIK)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100
The bug affects me too, I'm using Precise 12.04.2 on an HP Pavilion Elite
hpe-130it computer (motherboard MS-7613, BIOS version 5.15, Intel i5-650 CPU ).
However, Memtest works fine if I use the bootable ISO available on memtest.org,
using both the latest version and the one that comes with the U
** Tags added: lucid
** Tags added: quantal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications about this bug go
I Just downloaded newest version of memtest86+ available (4.20--uploaded
at 01/25/2011) from memtest.org. I then extracted the ISO from a .gz
archive with Archive Manager, and burned the ISO to DVD as an image with
xfburn. (I couldn't find a handy CD--extracted ISO after download is a
mere 1MB+.) T
No change. Even took out CMOS battery. Still can't test mem. I got a new
"Triple-core" CPU yesterday; I want to put that in, also.
I've heard that a newer version of memtest86+ is available. Shall try
downloading ISO and burning...shall investigate that first.
--
You received this bug notificat
Xubuntu 12.10 similar error. Popped up recently--I've been having
problems with memory and paging, so I ran memtest86+ from menu. My
optical drives weren't detected--system kept polling them till they
weren't. Rabbit TV required much memory--deep paging using WinXP.
Had recently ordered two bigger
Same issue on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS
4x2GB 1333MHz RAM
Intel board DP55WB
too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower
I've reproduced this with an HP Z620, with 64G of RAM.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications about th
Affects me:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Memory: 12 GiB
Processor: Intel Core i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz x 8
Graphics: GeForce GTS 450/PCIe/SSE2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too
Also happens in 12.10 with BIOS FC 06/05/2012 on mainboard Gigabyte
M68MT-S2, 4GB of memory, Athlon(tm) II X2 260.
Installed: grub 2.00-7ubuntu5, and memtest86+ 4.20-1.1ubuntu1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Still happens in 12.10 with BIOS F7c on mainboard Gigabyte GA-MA-790GP-
UD-4H
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage
Still happens in 12.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launc
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title
My PC stops working suddenly. Temperature doesn't seem to be an issue, and
trying memtest returns the same error with too small a lower memory.
Could it have to do with those sudden stops?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
A simpler workaround which worked for me but might not work in all cases
or might not be available is to use the "multiboot" entry in the boot
menu; in maverick, you would have to re-enable it in
/etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ and run update-grub.
The reported reason why this entry is commented out in
See upstream at http://forum.canardpc.com/threads/51181-error-too-small-
lower-memory
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
T
Same here on Intel Atom board. Ubuntu 10.10. Problem persists even if
I drop the Memtest 4.20 binary in to the Ubuntu /boot partition.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
e
Workaround is to boot using ultimate boot cd from CD or usb stick and choose
memtest.
I believe this has to do with the version of grub because this software will
work with older versions of grub.
I don' know how grub and memtest interact.
http://ultimatebootcd.com/
--
You received this bug not
"Too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000)"
Same problem on Ubuntu 10.10 x86
M/B : Intel D525MW (Intel Atom)
Memory: 2 x 2Gb DDR3-1066 SODIMM
HDD : Seagate 7200.4 500Gb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
I got "error too small lower memory (99100 > 96400)
I'm on Ubuntu 10.10 64bit Raid1
CPU: Intel® Core i5 750
Motherboard: Asus P7P55D (P55 Chipset, Socke 1156, 4x DDR3)
Memory: 4GB DDR3 1333mhz (2x 2GB)
Hard Drives: 50
I couldn't boot into memtest from my lucid install. I then tried lucid
and hardy CDs, but neither worked.
I then downloaded a memtest iso[1] from memtest.org, and that worked.
[1] http://www.memtest.org/download/4.10/memtest86+-4.10.bin.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I am affected by this error in memtest86+, too. I get exactly the same error
message:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
This is a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick, AMD64, all software
patches installed.
Motherboard is a Gigabyte MA-770T-UD3
CPU is a AMD Athlon II X2 250
4
This was an issue with Lucid and now with Maverick. I agree it would be
good to have it solved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0
*bump*
any news on this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
Title:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I'm having the same issue as hallenrm: "too small lower memory (0X99100
> 0X8f000)"
I'm running maverick on a 8GB machine.
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
The same here, error: To small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) on Lucid
10.04 up to date with 4Gb of ram on GA-MA 770-UD3.
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I also have exactly the same problem. I have a PC with Atom 1.6 Ghz
processor and 1 MB RAM. I have intalled Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10) only
yesterday. On Memtest at boot, i get the message "too small lower memory
(0X99100 > 0X8f000)
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.l
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707339/+files/Xorg.0.log.old.txt
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: "version.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707338/+files/version.log
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707337/+files/lspci-vvnn.log
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707316/+files/dmesg.log
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
I do have the similar error says:
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000)
Press any key to continue...
## My system Specs:
-Computer-
Processor : 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz
Memory : 1020MB (679MB used)
Operating System: Ubun
I'm seeing a similar error message: "error: too small lower memory
(0x99100 > 0x96800)."
Dell T3500 workstation with 12GB of RAM
Ubuntu Lucid AMD64
memtest86+ 4.00-2ubuntu3
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notifica
Same problem "error too small lower memory (99100 > 94c00)" with:
Lucid 64 2.6.33R5
Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3 firmware F6
2*1Go RAM
xa...@htpc:/media$ apt-cache policy memtest86+
memtest86+:
Install: 4.00-2ubuntu3
Candidat: 4.00-2ubuntu3
Table de version:
*** 4.00-2ubuntu3 0
500 http://
See this issue with Linux Mint 9
Intel Motherboard: D945GCNL
2x1GB DD2 RAM
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
This manifests on Lucid 64, running on a system with Intel Core i7-930
on an ASRock X58 Extreme motherboard with the latest BIOS version, 6 GB
of RAM.
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Same problem on a Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3 (AMD 770chipset), Phenom II X4.
Running 64bit Lucid.
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I have this same problem on a Dell Studio XPS with Core I7 running
Karmic 64 bit.
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Also the fresh installed Lucid...
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #549429
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549429
** Also affects: memtest86+ (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549429
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 >
Seems to be a general problem!
My now fresh installed Karmic got the same problem...
Linux lucid 2.6.31-20-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 04:38:19 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
grub-common 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1
memtest86+ 2.11-3ubuntu5
--
error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)
https:/
76 matches
Mail list logo
