[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-05-21 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
Hi, I also tried to test via a kernel 2.6.32-21-server to 2.6.32-22-server but I had no problem passing dkms is properly implemented with the patch on deb package # apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.32-22-server linux-image-2.6.32-22-server r...@ubuntu:/var/lib/dkms/drbd8# dkms status drbd8,

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-05-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Proposed fix for lucid-proposed. ** Patch added: drbd8.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48798525/drbd8.debdiff -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-05-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Proposed fix for lucid-proposed. ** Patch added: drbd8.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48798525/drbd8.debdiff -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-05-20 Thread crh
The fix does not work on my freshly kickstarted ubuntu lucid server. The result is the same, dkms complains that no kernel sources are installed despite both generic and server headers are present. The reason is that dkms tries to use the build link in /lib/modules/2.6.32-21-generic (which does

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-19 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
Hi, I search a reason of this problem, and I found something, when dkms launch the drbd module compilation with make command, the Makefile of drbd take the kernel source dir of 2.6.32-16-generic : DKMS make.log for drbd8-8.3.7 for kernel 2.6.32-21-generic (i686) lundi 19 avril 2010, 11:04:01

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Great, thank you. I'm applying the patch for this issue and subscribing main sponsors. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Patch added: drbd8.debdiff

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Obviously, attaching, not applying :) -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-19 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
Hi, I search a reason of this problem, and I found something, when dkms launch the drbd module compilation with make command, the Makefile of drbd take the kernel source dir of 2.6.32-16-generic : DKMS make.log for drbd8-8.3.7 for kernel 2.6.32-21-generic (i686) lundi 19 avril 2010, 11:04:01

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Great, thank you. I'm applying the patch for this issue and subscribing main sponsors. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Patch added: drbd8.debdiff

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Obviously, attaching, not applying :) -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 16.04.2010 21:38, Gaëtan Ferez wrote: No, i don't think Because, when i did this commands : # dkms remove -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms build -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms install -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic Without any other command, the

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 18.04.2010 21:15, Ante Karamatić wrote: Hm... This sounds like dkms issue. I managed to reproduce the issue. I've booted 2.6.32-16 kernel and installed drbd8-utils. drbd module loaded fine and worked. But when rebooted in 2.6.32-21, it failed with the same symptoms: drbd: disagrees about

Re: [Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 16.04.2010 21:38, Gaëtan Ferez wrote: No, i don't think Because, when i did this commands : # dkms remove -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms build -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms install -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic Without any other command, the

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 18.04.2010 21:15, Ante Karamatić wrote: Hm... This sounds like dkms issue. I managed to reproduce the issue. I've booted 2.6.32-16 kernel and installed drbd8-utils. drbd module loaded fine and worked. But when rebooted in 2.6.32-21, it failed with the same symptoms: drbd: disagrees about

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
If i did apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.32-20-generic linux- image-2.6.32-20-generic from a version with the 2.6.32-16 kernel and the drbd module, I have the same error : Invalid module format when i restarted on the last kernel The syslog tail the same thing, just : drbd8 (8.3.7):

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Scott Moser
ah. so it would seem that dkms is not finding the correct version of headers if there are multiple present. Does that sound right? -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Also affects: dkms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
No, i don't think Because, when i did this commands : # dkms remove -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms build -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms install -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic Without any other command, the module is successfully build and modprobe don't

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
If i did apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.32-20-generic linux- image-2.6.32-20-generic from a version with the 2.6.32-16 kernel and the drbd module, I have the same error : Invalid module format when i restarted on the last kernel The syslog tail the same thing, just : drbd8 (8.3.7):

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Scott Moser
ah. so it would seem that dkms is not finding the correct version of headers if there are multiple present. Does that sound right? -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Also affects: dkms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-16 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
No, i don't think Because, when i did this commands : # dkms remove -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms build -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic # dkms install -m drbd8 -v 8.3.7 -a 2.6.32-20-generic Without any other command, the module is successfully build and modprobe don't

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-15 Thread Scott Moser
Can you verify if this is still present? I just did: $ sudo apt-get install drbd8-utils linux-headers-generic that succeeded in building drbd.ko Then: $ sudo modprobe drbd I'm currently booted into -19-generic and have -21-generic installed. It seems strange that you got the module built but

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-15 Thread Scott Moser
Can you verify if this is still present? I just did: $ sudo apt-get install drbd8-utils linux-headers-generic that succeeded in building drbd.ko Then: $ sudo modprobe drbd I'm currently booted into -19-generic and have -21-generic installed. It seems strange that you got the module built but

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-14 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44126094/Dependencies.txt -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 562832] Re: module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20

2010-04-14 Thread Gaëtan Ferez
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44126094/Dependencies.txt -- module drbd8 update kernel from 2.6.32-16 to 2.6.32-20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to