[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-07-11 Thread Fabrice Coutadeur
Hi, I've opened bug #604343 to be notified when python-xpcom will be reintroduced. Thanks, Fabrice -- Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

Re: [Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-07-11 Thread Chris Coulson
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 17:25 +, lkcl wrote: > "rushing ahead" and screwing with ubuntu users, by blatantly removing > complex package dependencies that those users are completely incapable > of compiling for themselves, isn't exactly "polite", is it? why should > _i_ have to be the one that's

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-07-11 Thread Chris Coulson
We planned to package python-xpcom at some point in Maverick, but everyone has been busy with more important work so far this cycle (ie, updating Firefox to 3.6.x in every release, which has taken up a lot of time from the people who would probably be otherwise working on this). It will get done at

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-07-10 Thread Luke Faraone
So, would it be acceptable if pyjamas was shipped in Lucid but without pyjamas-desktop? This seems like the easiest solution to implement. For Maverick, we can either continue to do that, have it use WebKit, or get python-xpcom supported, but the latter two are outside my realm of expertise. -- P

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-07-10 Thread lkcl
> Your attitude is hardly going to make > contributors feel compelled to help resolve this. "rushing ahead" and screwing with ubuntu users, by blatantly removing complex package dependencies that those users are completely incapable of compiling for themselves, isn't exactly "polite", is it? wh

Re: [Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-06-04 Thread Chris Coulson
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 22:09 +, lkcl wrote: > p.s. if you _really_ want to help, then change python-xpcom to depend on > xulrunner-1.9.1 and allow it to be installed at the same time as > xulrunner-1.9.2 - you _can_ do that, can't you? > No, we can't do that. We only support xulrunner 1.9.2 i

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-06-04 Thread lkcl
@lfaraone: wronggg. if you actually bothered to look at the multi-level dependencies in the pyjamas source package, you would note that there are about eight or nine packages ONLY ONE OF WHICH is dependent on python-hulahop, and that is pyjamas-desktop. pyjamas-desktop IS NOT A CORE DEPENDENCY.

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-05-13 Thread C Anthony Risinger
if anything the dependency was optional. the dependency on python- hulahop was only for 1 of about 9 subprojects with "pyjamas". it can also be used (less successfully) with webkit... please include it for Lucid+1. pyjamas's only hard dependency is python. -- Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 sou

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-05-13 Thread Luke Faraone
@Prins: From what I can tell,Pyjamas depended on python-hulahop, which uses python-xpcom, which is not shipped in Lucid due to lack of time to maintain it at the moment. -- Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567819 You

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-05-13 Thread W. Prins
As someone with an interest in Pyjamas which is potentially affected by the above removals, can someone explain to me in simple terms why it was actually neccesary to remove anything in the first place? From how I read the description some things were split into seperate packages (which is fine),

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-05-13 Thread lkcl
i trust that nobody's been stupid enough to remove pyjamas without consulting the developers and the users. there have been a number of complaints - we get about one every three weeks - that pyjamas-desktop does not work because the bugreports on how to successfully fix python- hulahop by running

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-04-21 Thread Martin Pitt
2010-04-21 12:23:27 INFORemoving candidates: 2010-04-21 12:23:27 INFOxulrunner-1.9.1 1.9.1.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 in lucid 2010-04-21 12:23:27 INFOxulrunner-1.9.1 1.9.1.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 in lucid amd64 2010-04-21 12:23:27 INFOxulrunner-1.9.1 1.9.1.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu1

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-04-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Ah sorry, those are alternative dependencies, nevermind. -- Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-04-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Hm, when looking at the existing reverse dependencies, I see some packages which you haven't mentioned: -- lucid/universe i386 deps on xulrunner-1.9.1: mozplugger python-hulahop xul-ext-firebug xul-ext-flashgot -- lucid/universe build deps on xulrunner-1.9.1-dev: mongodb sugar-hulahop xiphos What

[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

2010-04-21 Thread Chris Coulson
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9.1 See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/ https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-new-firefox-support-model + + sugar-hulahop depends on python-xpcom, which was