lucid has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the lucid task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Well, I think I'll simply keep recompiling it myself. After all, not
everything needs to be packaged... It's a pity though, because I know of
no other UPnP/DLNA server as flexible as mediatomb.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: Micah Gersten (micahg) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Maverick)
Assignee: Micah Gersten (micahg) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: Micah Gersten (micahg) = (unassigned)
** Changed
maverick has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the maverick task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
natty has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the natty task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Bump
Is there no option than build for myself? And this only because the
current JS library cannot be !simply! put into the place of the dropped
one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It's a bit more difficult because the old JS library's API isn't
available any more. And the old library is really, really, outdated,
meaning that there are no security fixes either, so I can understand
that it was dropped.
Actually, it'd be up to MediaTomb (upstream) to update MediaTomb. But
The grab libjs from debian, and build for yourself is a way to go, but dirty.
http://tobias-zimmer.blogspot.com/2011/07/howto-compile-mediatomb-with-javascript.html
But (mnl) you could tell more about: until I have my own server
implementation ready. Because right now for my samsung smart tv
My own solution is still going to take some time, just mentioned it
because starting my project was triggered by MediaTomb having obviously
been abandoned. Thanks for the link, should be helpful for everybody who
comes across this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This bug is open since 2010 !!
Does mediatomb is a reliable solution ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
To manage notifications about
I got this working in Natty (and it should work in earlier releases)
simply by adding the Karmic repository to my apt sources (ie, sudo gedit
/etc/apt/sources.list). I then simply force and lock the mediatomb,
mediatomb-common and mediatomb-daemon packages. Annoyingly update
manager will still try
This still occurs in 11.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Any news for lucid ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
If it's fixed, then why is there no indication of it in this bug? I
certainly don't see a new version of mediatomb on Maverick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in
The latest update for lucid seems to work! Many Thanks!!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@Raik: Thx for the recent update of your fix :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Nobody wants to fix this?
Raik's patch works for me ... THX !!!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
No, it just means that I made sure all the tags and tasks are current :)
On 01/10/2011 06:12 PM, godsyn wrote:
Does this mean that there are no plans to resolve the broken package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: mediatomb (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: mediatomb (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Micah Gersten (micahg)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Does this mean that there are no plans to resolve the broken package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
Title:
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
There are three options, surely? Use the mediatomb build flags to
produce a static build, that way it won't break each time xulrunner
changes. True, it means it is using out of date code but at least it
doesn't have to be rebuilt each time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Is it necessary to limit the version of xulrunner by using
xulrunner-1.9.2-dev ( 1.9.2.13) ? Wouldn't it just be easier to say
any xulrunner greater than 1.9.2 and leave it at that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The problem is that the path to the necessary library libmozjs.so
changes with every xulrunner update. For 1.9.2.13 it is
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.13/libmozjs.so for example.
There are 2 possibilities to solve this problem (afaik). Hardcode the
path at compile-time into the binary. That's what i
I know that asking for bugs to be resolved in the bugs comments is not
the way to do it, but I am getting desperate hear. Can somebody please
have a look at this. Pretty please with sugar on top.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I know it isn't a perfect solution but, as a temporary workaround and to
take the pressure off the developers, I've discovered that there is a
statically built version of 0.11.0r2 still available on the sourceforge
pages
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/mediatomb/files/MediaTomb/0.11.0/)
which has
I did no good with the PPA, but with Maverick, if you want to get
Mediatomb running without the JS scripts (eg. as a get-around for
Christmas), you just need to change one line in
/etc/mediatomb/config.xml ..
virtual-layout type=js
-
virtual-layout type=builtin
All the other lines referring to
Hi Raik,
Thanks for the info. If you are able to get mediatomb-js working again
on Lucid in the next couple of days, you can officially rename yourself
Santa Claus, at least in this household! Your help on this is VERY
appreciated.
In the meanwhile I'll start reading the link you posted, to
Raik,
I'd love to try what you described ...you can do dpkg-source -x
mediatomb_0.12.1-0ubuntu1custom2.dsc... but frankly haven't got a clue
how to do it! I would like to know (a) if it should work for Lucid and
(b) if you could either point me to some more basic instructions on how
to build a
@MikeN maybe you can find some Help here:
https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/
At the moment i get the following error message when trying to upload
the most recent version of the lucid package:
Rejected:
Unhandled exception processing upload: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'md5'
I asked
Sorry to hear that my PPA didn't work out. Raik, thank you for the
information! When I get a chance, I'll do some more work on it and test
it on a fresh VM this time to make sure that it works. Thanks!
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received
I think there may be a problem with the dependencies in your ppa,
Brandon. It won't let me install it unless I install 68 additional
packages; none of which appear to have any relevance to mediatomb. Many
of them are development and graphical libraries. I'm very interested in
trying out your
Yes, there are so many libraries of development that I think there are
not useful for Mediatomb.
Thanks.
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi,
here are the changes that need do be done for maverick. You need
mediatomb_0.12.1.orig.tar.gz and the files I've attached. Than you can
do dpkg-source -x mediatomb_0.12.1-0ubuntu1custom2.dsc.
For every xulrunner update you need to update the dependencies for the
new version in the control
I finally figured out how to put a PPA together, so I've got a working
version of mediatomb 0.12.1 for Maverick with JS enabled:
https://launchpad.net/~brandon-konkle/+archive/mediatomb-js
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug
I'd love to see this make it into Maverick as an SRU. I tried to update
the diff above for Maverick and xulrunner 1.9.2.12, but my experience in
Debian packaging was unfortunately insufficient. One of these days I'm
going to have to read the documentation...
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
I'm sorry, I do plan on SRUing this to Maverick and Lucid, but I just
haven't had time yet.
On 11/04/2010 11:44 PM, Brandon Konkle wrote:
I'd love to see this make it into Maverick as an SRU. I tried to update
the diff above for Maverick and xulrunner 1.9.2.12, but my experience in
Debian
@Raik Bieniek
Can we get an update on your patched version (ppa) to run with the new
xulrunner seeing as it still hasn't been implemented to the main repos?
mediatomb-common: Depends: xulrunner-1.9.2 ( 1.9.2.12) but
1.9.2.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 is to be installed.
--
No JS in
Somehow I missed that one. Thanks for informing me.
The problem is, I no longer use lucid so I'm not directly affected and
my automatic informing system failed this time. I didn't thought that I
have to maintain this ppa that long. :-(
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
Thanks for the reply.
If i understood you right: there will be an update for Maverick concerning
mediatomb with JS?
How good is the chance to get it within this year? Thanks in advance.
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification
Sorry, this didn't make it into Maverick, but I'll add it after Natty
opens and then we should be able to SRU it into Lucid and Maverick.
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-10.10-beta = maverick-updates
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
@ Micah
is mediatomb with JS support now in the RC of 10.10?
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I was curious on this topic as well - I'm having issues with duplicates
in Windows Media Player 12 that I'd like to get resolved and it requires
the .js modifications (which I cannot enable or change). As a temporary
fix, I have switched to XBMC but I have a bunch of home computers that I
would
Any existing news?
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
@ Micah:
Will it be fixed in final 10.10?
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I will try to re-enable when I merge from Debian.
On 09/07/2010 03:53 AM, Josch wrote:
@ Micah:
Will it be fixed in final 10.10?
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Yes plz, without js mediatomb is only half as usefull
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
JS support is still not in... even in Beta 10.10, isn't it?
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
No, sorry, I still need to fix this.
On 09/05/2010 03:08 AM, Josch wrote:
JS support is still not in... even in Beta 10.10, isn't it?
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Hello,
How difficult would it be to use python instead of js ?
Arian
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Pushing this back until Maverick beta.
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu)
Milestone: maverick-alpha-2 = ubuntu-10.10-beta
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
So - now that an upgrade to xulrunner is available we ran into the same issue.
I'd like to keep my mediatomb installation intact - but also would like to stay
current with the distribution.
Is there any fix in sight that will remove the dependency between
xulrunner and mediatomb?
Many thanks,
I've uploaded a updated version. Binary packages should be available soon.
I've also created a rss feed for me that informs me of xulrunner updates for
the next times. ;-)
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you
Raik Bieniek, I'm using your (updated) PPA. It is working well. Thank
you (again) for the time and effort put into this.
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I don't know if including a minor version upgrade breaks Ubuntu LTS
policy, but MediaTomb 0.12.1 fixes Youtube Videos so, if someone is
going to work on this
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Also affects: mediatomb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee:
@aatoma
Please file a new bug for that. Maybe the functionality can be
backported to Lucid.
On 06/08/2010 08:55 AM, aatoma wrote:
I don't know if including a minor version upgrade breaks Ubuntu LTS
policy, but MediaTomb 0.12.1 fixes Youtube Videos so, if someone is
going to work on this
Added a Maverick milestone so I don't forget about this. We'll update
Lucid once the fix is in Maverick.
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None = maverick-alpha-2
** Changed in: mediatomb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Micah Gersten (micahg)
--
No JS in
The patch needs work since it's only made for one xulrunner release and
we rebuild xulrunner with new releases regularly. I probably won't get
to this until next month, but I think we can get it into Lucid.
On 05/09/2010 09:41 PM, Corey Buckingham wrote:
ppa is working for me as well could we
ppa is working for me as well could we get this pushed it proposed? 3
years is a long time to go with a broken media server if we go 10.04
12.10
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The PPA also works for me. Thanks!
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I'll give this a try myself, otherwise my media server is going back
9.10 - I've wasted about six hours today trying to get mediatomb built
and working the way it was.
I really think users should have been given a warning or choice or
notification or something when they upgraded to Lucid -
Raik Bieniek, you're a hero in this household, your version is working
just fine - you saved me from having to rebuild the server. Many, many
thanks.
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Raik Bieniek, I'm using your PPA. It is working well. Thank you for the
time and effort put into this.
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I've made a patch to link mediatomb against xulrunner. Maybe there is a
better solution to handle the dependencies to xulrunner, but at least it
works for me.
I've also made a PPA if this feature doesn't get into lucid. It can be found
here:
https://launchpad.net/~jinto/+archive/mediatomb-js
**
The default config file is designed for the js enabled version. If js
support is going to be removed, can the config file be rewritten to be
functional without it? As is, the package installs but does not run.
--
No JS in 0.12.0~svn2018-6ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568275
You
This was disabled deliberately because it was still depending on
libmozjs, which we removed ages ago. It doesn't build against the latest
xulrunner because it hard-codes header paths rather than using pkg-
config, and is looking in all the wrong places for headers. I don't have
the time to fix
67 matches
Mail list logo
