[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-12-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for eucalyptus (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-12-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for eucalyptus (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-05-19 Thread Torsten Spindler
The first existing cloud was using the simple topology: one front-end, one node controller. The cloud we installed first was made up of 3 machines: 1 CLC+Walrus, 1 CC+SC, 2 NC. After installing the second cloud, both clouds had two clusters registered against it. However, the output of

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-05-19 Thread Torsten Spindler
The first existing cloud was using the simple topology: one front-end, one node controller. The cloud we installed first was made up of 3 machines: 1 CLC+Walrus, 1 CC+SC, 2 NC. After installing the second cloud, both clouds had two clusters registered against it. However, the output of

Re: [Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-05-19 Thread brian mullan
Are both clouds on the same network segment? If so is there any chance that the NC of the 2nd cloud confused as to which CLC it belongs to? Is DHCP configured in both CLC's? On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Torsten Spindler tors...@canonical.comwrote: The first existing cloud was using the

Re: [Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-05-19 Thread Torsten Spindler
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 11:35 +, brian mullan wrote: Are both clouds on the same network segment? Yes. If so is there any chance that the NC of the 2nd cloud confused as to which CLC it belongs to? Quite possible. Is DHCP configured in both CLC's? It's not configured on either one,

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-05-18 Thread Mathias Gug
Could you outline the network topology used by both clouds? Could you also outline what was failing? ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- NC not available when auto registrating with second

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-05-18 Thread Mathias Gug
Could you outline the network topology used by both clouds? Could you also outline what was failing? ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- NC not available when auto registrating with second

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-04-30 Thread Torsten Spindler
After stopping the other cloud and reinstalling it worked. -- NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

[Bug 572388] Re: NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present

2010-04-30 Thread Torsten Spindler
After stopping the other cloud and reinstalling it worked. -- NC not available when auto registrating with second cloud present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs