Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ttf-
It is not an issue for most users. Afterall, the weight "Regular" is
general, and CJK fonts are not usually provided with other weight
variants by OS vendor. As defoma hint is not commonly used, just ignore
this would be fine.
--
Font information nonconformity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57
Thank you for the new information.
Your last comment suggest that this situation still exist.
So confirming, the bug.
I understand that this is a low priority bug, and it could take a long time
before being fixed.
** Changed in: ttf-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
This bug was fixed in the package ttf-arphic-uming -
0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1
---
ttf-arphic-uming (0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* new upstream release
* fixed typo in package description (Closes: #442612)
* corrected homepage URL in control and changelog (Closes: #423
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ttf-
It is not an issue for most users. Afterall, the weight "Regular" is
general, and CJK fonts are not usually provided with other weight
variants by OS vendor. As defoma hint is not commonly used, just ignore
this would be fine.
--
Font information nonconformity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57
Thank you for the new information.
Your last comment suggest that this situation still exist.
So confirming, the bug.
I understand that this is a low priority bug, and it could take a long time
before being fixed.
** Changed in: ttf-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
This bug was fixed in the package ttf-arphic-uming -
0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1
---
ttf-arphic-uming (0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* new upstream release
* fixed typo in package description (Closes: #442612)
* corrected homepage URL in control and changelog (Closes: #423
This bug was fixed in the package ttf-arphic-uming -
0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1
---
ttf-arphic-uming (0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* new upstream release
* fixed typo in package description (Closes: #442612)
* corrected homepage URL in control and changelog (Closes: #423
It is not an issue for most users. Afterall, the weight "Regular" is
general, and CJK fonts are not usually provided with other weight
variants by OS vendor. As defoma hint is not commonly used, just ignore
this would be fine.
--
Font information nonconformity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57
Thank you for the new information.
Your last comment suggest that this situation still exist.
So confirming, the bug.
I understand that this is a low priority bug, and it could take a long time
before being fixed.
** Changed in: ttf-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ttf-
This bug was fixed in the package ttf-arphic-uming -
0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1
---
ttf-arphic-uming (0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* new upstream release
* fixed typo in package description (Closes: #442612)
* corrected homepage URL in control and changelog (Closes: #423
It is not an issue for most users. Afterall, the weight "Regular" is
general, and CJK fonts are not usually provided with other weight
variants by OS vendor. As defoma hint is not commonly used, just ignore
this would be fine.
--
Font information nonconformity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57
Thank you for the new information.
Your last comment suggest that this situation still exist.
So confirming, the bug.
I understand that this is a low priority bug, and it could take a long time
before being fixed.
** Changed in: ttf-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ttf-
It is not an issue for most users. Afterall, the weight "Regular" is
general, and CJK fonts are not usually provided with other weight
variants by OS vendor. As defoma hint is not commonly used, just ignore
this would be fine.
--
Font information nonconformity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57
Thank you for the new information.
Your last comment suggest that this situation still exist.
So confirming, the bug.
I understand that this is a low priority bug, and it could take a long time
before being fixed.
** Changed in: ttf-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ttf-
This bug was fixed in the package ttf-arphic-uming -
0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1
---
ttf-arphic-uming (0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* new upstream release
* fixed typo in package description (Closes: #442612)
* corrected homepage URL in control and changelog (Closes: #423
It is not an issue for most users. Afterall, the weight "Regular" is
general, and CJK fonts are not usually provided with other weight
variants by OS vendor. As defoma hint is not commonly used, just ignore
this would be fine.
--
Font information nonconformity
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57
Thank you for the new information.
Your last comment suggest that this situation still exist.
So confirming, the bug.
I understand that this is a low priority bug, and it could take a long time
before being fixed.
** Changed in: ttf-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
**
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ttf-
This bug was fixed in the package ttf-arphic-uming -
0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1
---
ttf-arphic-uming (0.2.20080216-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* new upstream release
* fixed typo in package description (Closes: #442612)
* corrected homepage URL in control and changelog (Closes: #423
24 matches
Mail list logo
