Dixi quod…
>This is fun – I built a sid and a precise chroot today, i386,
>and built mksh against dietlibc-dev_0.33~cvs20110918-4_i386.deb
>from Debian sid (dpkg -i’d on precise). It segfaults only on
>Ubuntu, not on Debian. It is _not_ -fstack-protector-all.
>
>Investigating. May be some gcc defa
Matthias Klose dixit:
>0.33~cvs20110710-2 still ftbfs
This is fun – I built a sid and a precise chroot today, i386,
and built mksh against dietlibc-dev_0.33~cvs20110918-4_i386.deb
from Debian sid (dpkg -i’d on precise). It segfaults only on
Ubuntu, not on Debian. It is _not_ -fstack-protector-all
Matthias Klose dixit:
>0.33~cvs20110710-2 still ftbfs
Héctor, can you debootstrap oneiric on one of your ARM boxen
and reproduce this there? I’ve got no ARM hardware.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
22:59⎜ glaub ich termkit is kompliziert | glabe nicht das man
damit schneller arbeitet | reizüberflutung │ w
0.33~cvs20110710-2 still ftbfs
[...]
rm -f ttt
bin-'arm'/diet -v -Os gcc -nostdinc -static -o ttt debian/test/tc523086.c
gcc -nostdlib -static -L/scratch/packages/tmp/dietlibc-0.33~cvs20110710/bin-arm
/scratch/packages/tmp/dietlibc-0.33~cvs20110710/bin-arm/start.o -nostdinc
-static -o ttt debian
and ftbfs ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584980
Title:
Please merge dietlibc 0.32-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
now synced to let it build unmodified
** Changed in: dietlibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed in: dietlibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
In the meanwhile, I got co-maintenance of dietlibc in Debian.
So I suggest you guys do split the update from ARM support,
and talk to Héctor Orón and (to a limited amount) me about
both. The Debian package _should_ get (better) ARM support
soonish, and I am monitoring the mailing list as well, whe
> I think the merging from sid is an independent task from armel FTBFS
or runtime problems.
Sounds good. As to the dietlibc binary package, I'd follow Debian as I
don't know any better...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
I think the merging from sid is an independent task from armel FTBFS or runtime
problems. That one is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dietlibc/+bug/381914
I'd rather have this synced first, then the arm specific issues looked at.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Jani, I subscribed you to this bug because I guess you have knowledge
with arm-related stuff. Could you look on this case?
Thanks and regards
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584980
Titl
Stefano, we didn't yet receive response from David Sugar. What's the
decision?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584980
Title:
Please merge dietlibc 0.32-5 (universe) from Debian unstabl
Up this one. Could you prepare a new debdiff to fix Stefano's
suggestions? If you are not interested, could you tell what restored
binary package? Can we drop again it or still ship?
** Summary changed:
- Please sync (or merge, if needed) newer version from Debian
+ Please merge dietlibc 0.32-5 (
12 matches
Mail list logo
