Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.laun
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
"As soon as computer is idle". It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is "as soon as computer is idle" instead of
"as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute".
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gn
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked aft
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as "As soon
as computer is idle" isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duratio
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid => Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You receiv
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as "invalid"
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is "fix released." If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as "Fix Commited" , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed t
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as "As soon
as computer is idle" isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duratio
Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.laun
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
"As soon as computer is idle". It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is "as soon as computer is idle" instead of
"as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute".
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gn
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked aft
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.laun
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
"As soon as computer is idle". It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is "as soon as computer is idle" instead of
"as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute".
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gn
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked aft
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as "As soon
as computer is idle" isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duratio
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid => Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You receiv
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as "invalid"
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is "fix released." If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as "Fix Commited" , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed t
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid => Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You receiv
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as "invalid"
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is "fix released." If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as "Fix Commited" , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed t
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as "As soon
as computer is idle" isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duratio
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://
Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.laun
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
"As soon as computer is idle". It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is "as soon as computer is idle" instead of
"as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute".
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gn
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked aft
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as "As soon
as computer is idle" isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duratio
Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.laun
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
"As soon as computer is idle". It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is "as soon as computer is idle" instead of
"as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute".
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gn
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked aft
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid => Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You receiv
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as "invalid"
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is "fix released." If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as "Fix Commited" , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed t
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid => Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You receiv
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as "invalid"
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is "fix released." If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as "Fix Commited" , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed t
Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.laun
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
"As soon as computer is idle". It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is "as soon as computer is idle" instead of
"as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute".
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gn
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked aft
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as "As soon
as computer is idle" isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duratio
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid => Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You receiv
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as "invalid"
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is "fix released." If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as "Fix Commited" , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed t
72 matches
Mail list logo