Hi Daniel,
Still, this is not a bug -- and, as such, I am closing it INVALID for
ubuntu-dev-docs. Please either:
* open a bug against one single package/programme
* move this discussion to a blog, or the forum, or a mailing list.
This one is a meta-bug in the most philosophical aspect possible;
** Tags added: ubuntu-series-bugs
** Tags removed: ubuntu-bugs
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
actually yes there is a test case I can log into
this is an actual machine build issue
maybe just for 64 builds but yes I have
noticed this on several machines
aside from bugs that I have filed...
in General
Any Release of Ubuntu should work
on a clean build
If Ubuntu does not support a build
@Daniel: certainly, rude comments are unacceptable, and we apologise for
what happened.
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Hi Daniel,
The point we are trying to make is that there is no hard data to pursue
on you complaint, which I understand it to be 'Ubuntu 64bits is getting
worse' -- "for the 64bit version of ubuntu since 8.10 it has steady and
rapidly gotten worse" (sic).
There is nothing we can do here. This is
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-docs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Well this is a bug because all developers
have to keep the same pace to releases
Ubuntu is supposed to give the end 'First Time' user
the current Edge of Linux
I all to well understand that means developers
would bear the task of keeping up to Ubuntu par
As per any comment against me persona
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 14:38 +, Chauncellor wrote:
> I apologize for the inflammatory remarks on my part. These comments do
> not in any way reflect on the hardworking bugsquad team; rather, these
> were the results of a weeks of tension and stress on my part. As you can
> see in my profile, I h
I apologize for the inflammatory remarks on my part. These comments do
not in any way reflect on the hardworking bugsquad team; rather, these
were the results of a weeks of tension and stress on my part. As you can
see in my profile, I have signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct
(http://www.ubuntu.com/c
Please explain the validity: What package does this affect? Ubuntu is
not a package. Your evolution doesn't work? There's probably a bug for
that.
So how will this be fixed? When you are satisfied? When all your little
bugs are fixed? What about the next person that comes along and has a
network c
Thank you for your interest in making Ubuntu better. Unfortunately,
general bugs like this are very hard to solve. Please file individual
bugs for each issue you are having. One issue per bug is the best way
to insure that they get looked at by the proper people. If a bug is not
looked at withi
Dear Chauncellor aka- Brett Cornwall
please stop spamming me...
as per your email-"If you continue with this I will report your to some of the
Canonical
employees."
You are welcome to do what you so choose
Like I have stated this is not a liked bug - but it is valid
** Changed in: ubuntu
This is not in any means a bug report. This is a collection of separate
bugs (not even, since nothing is specified past "it won't work". If
there is something that does not work, then file a bug report or search
for existing ones.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Invalid
--
Ubuntu bug
Spouting a tantrum -? how?
I am glad that you gave me THE numbered list
but it is true there are release packages that fail
firefox- extremely faulty since 3.0
gnome desktop- unstable since 2.6
evolution mail - might work if you don't get mail
openoffice- works only if you are working with linu
Please refrain from spouting temper tantrums on bug trackers.
Do you see just how many bugs there are to deal with? Do you know how
small canonical is? Do you know that they are already swamped with
things? Do you know how much smaller our userbase is than the two big
companies?
If you want the b
Could you please point to the bugs you would like to have fixed? I have
checked the bugs you have reported - from your launchpad account, on the
bugs tab, and most of them are confirmed, and most of them are upstream
issues: Firefox and Thunderbird issues should be fixed by mozilla, gnome
issues sh
hmm I can't
then maybe thats a bug // funny??
yes I can confirm that this is a bug because it has happened.
What drives Ubuntu is the ease of use and the many resources
available to end users.
The fact that you may get your bugs fixed
at the time or answered in a timely manner is your experi
You can't confirm a bug you filed yourself. Besides this is not a bug,
just a complain. It's friday, go out, have fun, don't abuse the bug
system.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596127
You received this bug notif
I see that it did not take long to have it marked as invalid
this is confirmed by the number of outstanding bugs and
the way that they are handled
I am certain that this is not a liked bug but it is a bug.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Invalid
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
I would think that Ubuntu loses alot of Users because of this.
--
Ubuntu bugs not fixed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
21 matches
Mail list logo
