x11-common is hardly depending on X, it contains no xserver, no
drivers, it's just some common files. It's installed size is 580k.
If the complaint is just that the package has x11 in the name, I could
always rename it to not have people complain about not wanting X on
their servers. :)
--
The same keyboard maps are now used for the console and for X, which is
a big win for us because previously, they were always out of sync, and
the X maps are much more descriptive.
Therefore, ubuntu-minimal (as it is intended to provide a functional
console) depends on the keymaps from X (and no
You're right. I reckon ubuntu-minimal or ubuntu-standard shouldn't
depend on X packages.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info = Confirmed
--
Ubuntu-minimal for Edgy now includes X
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59727
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-minimal 1.24 doesn't seem to contain any X dependencies. Is this
still issue for you?
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
Ubuntu-minimal for Edgy now includes X
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59727
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Yes. I tried removing ubuntu-minimal and installing it again and here's
what I got:
apt-get -V install ubuntu-minimal
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
console-setup (1.7ubuntu9)
ubuntu-minimal depends on console-setup:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/edgy/i386/ubuntu-minimal/1.24
console-setup depends on xkb-data:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/edgy/i386/console-setup/1.7ubuntu9
xkb-data depends on X:
The dependency for console-setup was added in ubuntu-minimal 1.23
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/edgy/i386/ubuntu-minimal/1.23
--
Ubuntu-minimal for Edgy now includes X
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59727
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
