Gunnar,
right, I just uploaded version 20 to fix this. Thanks!
Martin
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system menu entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Just a detail. I believe it should be
NoDisplay=true
(lower-case 't') to safely prevent displaying.
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system menu entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/gdm-guest-session
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system menu entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This bug was fixed in the package gdm-guest-session - 0.19
---
gdm-guest-session (0.19) natty; urgency=low
* Do not launch if screenlocking fails (LP: #600559)
* Provide /usr/bin/ symlink and (hidden by default) desktop file
(LP: #615301)
-- Gunnar Hjalmarsson
While I do see the logic in not duplicating, it's not in the System menu
it appears, it's in Applications - System Tools (not very crowded). I
think that the guest session feature is not obviously comparable with
logout, restart etc., and that it would have deserved the improved
visibility. But of
Gunnar Hjalmarsson [2010-11-11 10:37 -]:
While I do see the logic in not duplicating, it's not in the System menu
it appears, it's in Applications - System Tools (not very crowded).
In fact it should be empty. We don't want this menu in a default
installation, stuff should go into the
The /usr/bin/ symlink is fine, but adding a desktop file with user
visible strings is more work. It needs to be a .desktop.in file, and
gdm-guest-session would need to grow an intltool setup, so that the
desktop file can be translated properly.
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system
Martin,
As regards translation, I took a short cut and simply pointed to the textdomain
of indicator-session, which seems to work fine. Is it still a must to do it the
hard way? ;-)
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system menu entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615301
You
Oh, indeed I missed that. I guess that's okay for an Ubuntu specific
package like gdm-guest-session :)
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system menu entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
But shouldn't we hide the menu entry by default? It's usually in the
session indicator menu, and the system menu is already crowded enough; I
wouldn't like to aggravate that by adding duplicate information.
We could hide it by default, and then people can unhide it with the menu
editor. Does that
Hide menu item within guest sessions
** Patch removed: gdm-guest-session_fix-615301.diff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm-guest-session/+bug/615301/+attachment/1726159/+files/gdm-guest-session_fix-615301.diff
** Patch added: gdm-guest-session_fix-615301.diff
** Branch linked: lp:~gunnarhj/ubuntu/natty/gdm-guest-session/bugfixes
--
include /usr/bin link, desktop file, and system menu entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The linked branch and the patch includes a symlink and a desktop file as
suggested.
As regards the comparison with logout, shutdown etc., I'm not convinced.
Even if there are similarities from a technical point of view, from a
user perspective I believe that the guest session feature is more like
13 matches
Mail list logo
