** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: openoffice.org-l10n (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: openoffice.org-voikko (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/openoffice.org-l10n
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
Title:
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
To manage notifications about this bug go
The current version in -proposed introduced a regression, and as there
is nobody currently working on this, I removed it from -proposed (we
need to clean up lucid-proposed for the Ubuntu 10.04.2 preparations).
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
**
This bug seems to be already reported. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/618024
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
@Slawa: No, this bug is a about a backport request while the bug you
referenced is a specific bug in OO.org.
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
It seems to me that here is the place to discuss possible issues with
the version in the lucid-proposed repository. As far as I understand the
version there is the version to be backported to lucid. The current
version in that repository would introduce a regression I pointed to.
After I found a
@Slawa: This place is of course tje correct place to discuss possible
regressions in -proposed. I just understood your comment 17 as this bug
being a duplicate of another bug (which is not the case).
@Matthias: Is it possible to have the version in -proposed to be updated
to 1:3.2.1-7ubuntu1?
The latest version from lucid-proposed (1:3.2.1-6ubuntu2~10.04.1) exhibits a
big problem with links during pdf export in writer.
The problem is explained here
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594275 and here
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812 (I have not found a
Update OK on Lucid i386, all OOo apps seem to work fine.
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I just accepted an updated version from Matthias
(1:3.2.1-6ubuntu2~10.04.1) which now also fixes the ARM build again, and
an additional fix. Please test this version as well, and let us know how
it works for you. It will be available on the archive servers in about
half a day.
--
backport OOo
I rejected the duplicate voikko upload.
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: openoffice.org-l10n (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Martin, there still seems to be a copy of ooo-voikko in the proposed
queue?
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
OOo update went smoothly with lucid-proposed, including ooo-voikko.
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I uploaded a no-change rebuild of voikko, will accept in an hour (need
to run now).
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Accepted openoffice.org-voikko into lucid-proposed, the package will
build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback
here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in:
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/openoffice.org-voikko
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: openoffice.org-voikko (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openoffice.org-voikko (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: openoffice.org-voikko (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
As usual until OOo 3.3, the lucid-proposed's OOo breaks (force-
uninstalls) openoffice.org-voikko extension, which should be rebuilt and
put to -proposed as well, and released to -updates at the same time.
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this
** Also affects: baltix
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
fixes bug #570147
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
This Function Wizard bug exists in the 1:3.2.1-6ubuntu1~10.04.1 0 build too,
so I think there is a regression:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594120
Maybe it's too far an edge case, but I do use the FW a lot, so I am
reverting to 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 0 for my daily work.
Steps
For the record, this was discussed with Matthias before. While this is
arguably a large changeset, having 3.2.1 in lucid has been the plan all
the time (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-
openoffice), it just wasn't released in time. So this should spend some
longer time
Accepted openoffice.org into luic-proposed, the package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added:
The translation issue is bug #570147.
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The translation bug #570147 was solved for me by installing OpenOffice
from the lucid proposed repository.
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Also affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openoffice.org-l10n (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623267
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: None = lucid-updates
** Changed in: openoffice.org-l10n (Ubuntu Lucid)
the changes file shows:
Closes: 512731 531930 565692 570570 575109 575908 578023 578767 582785 584322
585829 587171 587402 587750 588495 593234 593440
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 616879 619858 623267
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in:
28 matches
Mail list logo
