In interaction design we have an awkward word, "workflow". It's used for
the steps you go through to do something, even if that thing has nothing
to do with work.
At first sight, the countdown seems to offer better workflow, because
for some people at least, it replaces a confirmation with an undo
** No longer affects: indicator-session
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623804
Title:
Enable users to configure on the previous 'shutdown timer' feature
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: indicator-session
Status: Confirmed => New
** Changed in: indicator-session
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
** Changed in: indicator-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
The dialog still isn't very fast. At least with a timer the computer
will still shutdown even if you walk away before seeing a warning
message, but you can also change your mind. Why keep people from adding
it back?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Changed in: indicator-session
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: indicator-session
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Enable users to configure on the previous 'shutdown timer' feature
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623804
You received this bug notification because you are a
the current behavior is a decision. even a few people previously thought
waiting 60sec for the computer to auto shutdown was the right way. thats
why the timer was removed
** Also affects: indicator-session
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: indicator-session (Ubuntu)
I
