Sync Request ACK'd
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Confirmed
--
FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
FFe is approved. Setting back to new for sponsor review.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => New
--
FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
I have no objections getting it in should you volunteer to review it.
Iulian
--
FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Reviewing new packages from Debian is not a major effort. I can do it if you
determine we should have it.
Scott Kitterman
--
FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
But in Maverick+1 music-applet can be removed as it done in Maverick, so
no double packages will be present.
This is not a showstopper for release and ppa available for people that need it
badly.
Only ordinary people left without music player control from panel for
half-a-year.
--
FFe: sync pa
Bringing back music-applet would definitely be a bad idea. Panflute
will be automatically synced from Sid when Maverick+1 is open for
development and I don't want to have 2 packages which do the same
thing in the archive.
The main reason I'm inclined to reject this is because I doubt that you
wil
If Maverick release will be out without panflute, let's bring back music-applet
package, which was in previous releases, have a good history and removed only
because of panflute inclusion.
Without it this will be a clear regression from previous release.
Must I file separate bug for this?
--
FF
Is there any strong reason why we should add this package at this point
in the release cycle? Could you please provide more information?
If there is no strong reason for it I recommend getting panflute through
backports once Maverick+1 is open for development.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status
** Summary changed:
- Include panflute in repositories
+ FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Opinion => New
--
FFe: sync panflute from Debian to replace music-applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625807
You received this bug notification
10 matches
Mail list logo
