...Release team reckon that will be 750 kB of sufficient space for the
Ubuntu Font Family package from flexing the 'example-content' package
until things fit.
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notifica
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family/phased-beta
Milestone: None => 0.7.0
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Milestone: 0.6.7 => 1.0.0
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Milestone: 1.0.0 => 0.7.0
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Also affects: ubuntu-font-family/trunk
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Milestone: None => 0.7.0
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
there are three ways I can think of to deploy it.
* Set the interface font name in *gconf* /desktop/gnome/interface/font_name
UbuntuBeta 10
* Make it a suggested font in the ambiance and radiance *themes*
* In *fontconfig* make it one of the fonts that alias to sans (tweaking stuff
in /etc/fon
Thanks Paul for lining us up to land if it comes together appropriately.
On 07/09/10 14:20, Paul Sladen wrote:
> I don't think we should run the risk of going with document
> font defaults (eg. the hinting/layout issues that need researching more
> for OpenOffice.org).
>
Agreed - this is interfa
** Tags added: uff-10.10-todo
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
We can concentrate on executing the rest of the to-do list above and
ensuring that the font family .deb package is available and in the right
places to be seeded into the CD images. This is virtually all tediously
technical and procedural; eg. tweaking the advertised font name,
version, license, d
Mandarin chinese takes *ages* to install the font (I thought it had
crashed) however it did eventually install and here it is, again no
issue caused directly by the new font as default. As an aside note, I
was a bit disappointed in the extent of the translations of the desktop,
I thought it would b
India has a *lot* of languages, I think I picked standard Hindi, again
not much of it in evidence on the desktop, but what was there does not
seem to be adversely affected by the addition of the new font
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Hindi [Running] - VirtualBox OSE.png"
https://bugs.launch
Arabic screenshot, more English than I had expected, but adding the font
and setting it as default didn't seem to do any harm at all.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Arabic [Running] - VirtualBox OSE.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+bug/629622/+attachment/1553026/+files/Scr
On 06/09/10 22:44, Alan Bell wrote:
> It is still one heck of a user interface freeze exception, but I would
> love to see it get in and as the default.
Yes, I agree it's a big change. But we took steps to mitigate it:
screenshotters have easy access to the font. We have had to keep the
font out
yeah, just using it as a known example of very distinctive font with a
limited set of glyphs so it is easy to see the behaviour of the desktop
when it encounters a missing character. I am a member and I have the
real font, but I am not sure I would be competent to spot missing
characters when runni
Mark, I think Alan was using that font because it has a limited
character-set as an example of what Ubuntu does when it can't find a
glyph.
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you ar
Completely wrong font, Alan :-) The correct one is available to Ubuntu
members and other groups from ppa:ubuntu-font-betatesting/ppa
Mark
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you ar
I tried setting my desktop font to the old ubuntu-title font which is a
very incomplete font. The attached image of the desktop and gedit shows
what the font server does when it comes across a missing glyph (it does
the right thing and uses the sans one) on the left is the language
selection dialog
Can we get preliminary feedback that the font substitution should work
in the general case? And if so, reinstate this bug as a goal for Maverick?
Mark
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification b
Having switched my desktop defaults to the Ubuntu font I actually can't
make the missing glyphs break anything. If I download the
notinubuntubeta.txt file and look at it in gedit or anything else and
set the font to ubuntu beta all the glyphs seem to display (presumably
from sans) in fact the only
Bruno,
Is there a font substitution map so that missing Ubuntu characters would
be pulled in from the existing fonts?
i.e. can we make Ubuntu the default and have no change for Arabic and
other users?
Mark
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launc
A cursory parse of Alan's missing glyphs file shows that the whole
alphabets are missing (Arabic, Armenian, Georgian to name the ones I
could spot). The first one in particular would mean that if the Ubuntu
font was made the default font, anybody who speaks Arabic, Farsi or Urdu
would be out of luc
Hmm. I wonder if we should defer the actual use of the font till 11.04?
That list of Paul's was comprehensive (thanks!) and longer than I'd
expected. It may be more realistic to use it as default font in 11.04.
Mark
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bu
based on the output of the font diff, and picking out all lines of the form
Glyph "uni" missing from UbuntuBeta
here is a list of all the missing characters, code points and unicode names.
There are more missing characters, but I don't understand how to parse them and
find out what they are.
To make the new font the desktop default either the theme could be adapted to
load the font, or "sans" which is an alias for a list of preferred fonts could
be updated to include ubuntu in the preferences list, I think that is in the
fontconfig package and would be a change to /etc/fonts/conf.av
The version(s) of the typeface available in the next ~1 month window are
likely to remain below the ~750kB mark, they will only consist of the
four fonts that are presently availabe: Regular, Italic, Bold and Bold
Italic in Standard only See the following:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu%20Font%
also the translations teams are going to need to test the desktop with
the new font, if there are any glyphs missing in languages we translate
to that would be an issue. I know a lot of testing has been done, but I
am not sure that full coverage of sans has been tested, I will have a go
at a visual
What we don't have yet is the ubuntubeta mono font, for terminal
applications and indeed monospaced comments like this on launchpad.net.
This would push up the size of the package for inclusion from 719K to
something a bit bigger. I also don't think that many people have been
using it as the defaul
We definitely do want it in, and used by default. It's in wide beta now,
accessible to all Ubuntu members, so there's no reason to think it will
throw up more issues than are already being reported on it.
Mark
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.lau
And usubscribing the release team until there is something to review.
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
Marking as invalid until someone involved in the font development
actually wants it in.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification becau
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: ubuntu
Milestone: None => ubuntu-10.10
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
UI Freeze only applies if this is changing the default UI. I haven't
heard that this font will be used by default - obviously that's a much
riskier change to land at this point than just including it by default
would be.
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https:
the size of ubuntu-private-fonts_0.1.10~ppa1_all.deb is 719K
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Jonathan, nothing to do with me directly, I was asking in #ubuntu+1
about the font and as nobody knew about plans for including it they
advised me to raise an FFE.
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug not
Alan, do you actually have anything to do with the release and inclusion
of the font or are you just submitting this bug as a hint to the people
who do?
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.7 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification b
This is a user interface change, needs approval from documentation teams
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UserInterfaceFreeze
What is the regression potential? Will word processing applications use
it as their default font? That might confuse some documents which would
expect Liberation or Deja fonts.
36 matches
Mail list logo
