Would it not be a good idea to replace the compiz package in universe
with official compiz head 0.2 when released, to avoid alot of confusion
after edgy release, as a major reason for the fork was namespace issues?
--
Packaging (Beryl AND Compiz packages)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63254
--
Actually, replacing the current version of the compiz package with the
official 0.2 release is what I would really like to see! Beryl would be
a bonus, but honestly I don't really care about it, because I use
fdo.org version.
--
Packaging (Beryl AND Compiz packages)
The namespace issue was really never a major reason for the fork, and as
far as replacing it with fdo goes, most users are used to compiz-quinn
and will expect that. So either way we go there will be confusion, I
figure its just as well to leave things alone if there is no way to get
beryl in to
Greetings,
From the #beryl-devel IRC list..
DBO pschulz01, no, beryl will not make edgy
DBO we are past the feature freeze
DBO we will be lucky just to get the libwnck patches in
DBO which I am working on right now
--
Packaging (Beryl AND Compiz packages)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63254
--
as an adendum to that, I would like to be pleasantly surprised. (I am
DBO btw)
--
Packaging (Beryl AND Compiz packages)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63254
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
closing this because we are working to try to get beryl in edgy+1. I
personally see a good chance it will make it in edgy+1 but still too
early to tell.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Packaging (Beryl AND Compiz packages)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63254
