[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2008-11-10 Thread François Grieu
I confirm Intrepid uses the native 1400*1050 LCD resolution on my Dell Inspiron 500m portable with Intel 855GM Integrated Graphics, Pentium M 1.5GHz.That one is fixed as far as this machine is concerned. -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2008-07-31 Thread Timo Aaltonen
There is no -i810 driver anymore in Intrepid, and -intel should replace it in every respect in 8.04. Closing the bug. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You

Re: [Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-10-16 Thread Aaron Whitehouse
Yes. The RC uses the new intel driver, which doesn't need 915resolution. The i810 driver does still require it. -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-10-15 Thread François Grieu
Excellent news: ubuntu-7.10-rc-desktop-i386 uses the native 1400*1050 LCD resolution on my Dell Inspiron 500m (Intel 855GM Integrated Graphics, Pentium M 1.5GHz), where gutsy-desktop-i386 Tribe 5 would use 1280*1024. Good job! -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-09-01 Thread François Grieu
Tested Gutsy Tribe 5 from gutsy-desktop-i386.iso on a Dell Inspiron 500m portable with optional 1400*1050 LCD; has Intel 855GM Integrated Graphics, Pentium M 1.5GHz. CD boot (default) selects 1280*1024, poor display. Native resolution not proposed in Screen Resolution; 1024x768 is usable but

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-09-01 Thread Alex Muntada
François, there's some kind of deadlock right now about the right way to find the right resolution on intel graphics: * i810 is the default, older driver but needs 915resolution (not installed by default) in order to get the right resolution * new intel driver gets the right values without

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-27 Thread Brian Murray
Aaron - please submit a new bug report with information regarding your system and Xorg setup before you installed 915resolution. Files needed are - /etc/X11/xorg.conf , /var/log/Xorg.0.log and the full output of 'sudo lspci -vvnn'. Thanks in advance. -- installing 915resolution for the

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-27 Thread Sander van Loon
I can confirm that the fix works in my case. When I installed Gutsy Tribe 4 on the same notebook as I mentioned in my initial bugreport here, Ubuntu chose the correct resolution - 1280 by 800 pixels - by default. However, when I install Tribe 4 on my desktop PC, which has a Dell 2007WFP 20 inch

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-27 Thread Alex Muntada
@Sander: this bug relates to Intel chips only, so it does not apply to the issue you are experiencing on your desktop PC. Therefore, filing a new bug is the right thing to do (unless it is been already reported, indeed). -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be

Re: [Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-27 Thread Aaron Whitehouse
@Brian: Thanks for the quick replies. Is is sufficient for me to uninstall 915resolution and give you those files, or do I need to reinstall Tribe 5 from scratch? -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You received this

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-27 Thread Brian Murray
Uninstalling and having dpkg reconfigure your xserver should be sufficient. -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-27 Thread Aaron Whitehouse
Please see Bug #135181 -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-08-24 Thread Aaron Whitehouse
I still have to install 915resolution to get the correct resolution with Gutsy Tribe 5. Isn't this meant to be Fix Released? Am I meant to be changing conf files? -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You received

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-17 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Yes, I'll mark this as fixed, since 1.9.94 is now in Feisty universe. Gutsy will have it by default! (replacing -i810) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-i810 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-17 Thread Marco
I can confirm that 1.9.93-1ubuntu1 release works fine without the 915resolution patch, on the laptop Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pro V3205. -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63560 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-17 Thread Alex Muntada
Just installed xserver-xorg-video-intel on Feisty, changed my xorg.conf i810 with intel, disabled 915resolution and rebooted. The resolution was fine but I got some trouble login into gnome session, as if there was something broken that brought me back to the login screen after some video probes.

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 2.0rc3 driver (http://users.tkk.fi/~tjaalton/dpkg/xserver-xorg- video-intel_1.9.93-1ubuntu1_i386.deb) works fine on my Thinkpad X60 tablet, and it is able to drive an external monitor at 1680 x 1050. However, it does not rotate. When I run xrandr, the screen flashes and is back at the same

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 2.0rc3 driver (http://users.tkk.fi/~tjaalton/dpkg/xserver-xorg- video-intel_1.9.93-1ubuntu1_i386.deb) works fine on my Thinkpad X60 tablet, and it is able to drive an external monitor at 1680 x 1050. However, it does not rotate. When I run xrandr, the screen flashes and is back at the same

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-05 Thread Timo Aaltonen
the new xorg upload should fix the dependancy-issues. Hopefully the black screen problems are gone when the final version is released. Rc2 didn't have those issues when I tested (rc3 does on my machine). -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-04-03 Thread Tomi
I (by mistake) uploaded quite the same issue, you can see it with log files here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/102147 Have you got some kind of connection with the intel driver coders? I think they also want to contribute with the releases of large distributions. --

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-31 Thread Timo Aaltonen
AFAIK the new driver ignores 915resolution completely.. so it's a bit strange that you have a different behaviour when running it. -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://launchpad.net/bugs/63560 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-30 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Please test 2.0rc3: http://users.tkk.fi/~tjaalton/dpkg/xserver-xorg-video- intel_1.9.93-1ubuntu1_i386.deb -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://launchpad.net/bugs/63560 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-30 Thread Erik Hill
Okay, installed it and am using it... It does fix the 1280x800 problem, I get that resolution even if 915resolution is not installed. However sometimes when I log out and log on again, I get a black screen (never got that before). I have to kill xorg (ctrl-alt-delete) to get it back. I had to

Re: [Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-30 Thread Alexis Wilke
Timo, This sounds like the problem I have. The resolution is fine for me, but if I don't first run 915resolution, I get a black screen. The screen is black on cold boot until I run 915resolution. Then it is fine, even if I reboot. So it looks like that table does not get changed on a reboot.

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-16 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-i810 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://launchpad.net/bugs/63560 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
definately for feisty+1, and maybe we can replace the current -modesetting-driver with it for feisty... the problem is that the version is 1.9.91 (rc1) and I'm having problems with it. We'll see. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: xorg = xserver-xorg-video-i810 -- installing

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
uh, let me clarify that last comment: the -intel driver is still at beta, and besides that it needs tricks to build against xorg-server-1.2. And it only does 1280x800 on my tests, and the fonts in the login screen are tiny.. So, if a better version is released soon, then maybe we could replace

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-08 Thread Alexis Wilke
This is in link with the bug I entered recently named: Boot of Desktop 6.10 (Edgy Eft) installer hangs on i845 -- bug #90558 I have a KVM, but I know the resolutions that my monitor support. I have had that for a while and it has been working with that computer under older Linux systems. With

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-03-08 Thread Alexis Wilke
Okay, I got the output requested. I think it will be somewhat useless. For one thing, the xresprobe returned exactly NOTHING. Again, I have a KVM so checking the monitor certainly does not work. ** Attachment added: Output of commands required in bug #90558

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2007-01-03 Thread Alex Muntada
** Tags added: 915resolution xorg -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary https://launchpad.net/bugs/63560 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2006-11-05 Thread Pochu
Hello. I have linked the feature to the wiki page. I think this is a big problem, and I would like this to be resolved in Feisty, if it's possible. Please tell me what we can done, to start working on this! Regards Pochu -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2006-11-04 Thread Andrew Ash
I found one at https://features.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/wide- screen-resolution Please help me work on that and we'll try to get it included in feisty. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed -- installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2006-11-04 Thread Sander van Loon
Thanks for your information, I'd be happy to help. However, how do we edit that specification and what more do we need to do in order for this problem to get the developers attention? If I visit the edit page it says I don't have permission. My Jabber ID is [EMAIL PROTECTED], please add me so that

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2006-11-04 Thread Andrew Ash
I couldn't edit the spec either, but I did create a wiki entry at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetterWidescreenDetection and asked the original creator of the wide-screen-resolution spec to link the two. I think he's the only one that can make that change. -- installing 915resolution for the correct

[Bug 63560] Re: installing 915resolution for the correct resolution shouldn't be necessary

2006-11-03 Thread Andrew Ash
That definitely sounds reasonable to me. I had this problem on my Dell Inspiron B130. There is probably a feature specification about this. Could you please check at https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+specs Thanks ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info --