** No longer affects: gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: indicator-session (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636693
Title:
** Changed in: indicator-session
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636693
Title:
Premature lock when launching guest session
To manage notifications
** Changed in: indicator-session
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636693
Title:
Premature lock when launching guest session
To manage
Hi Ted,
Would be good if this could be resolved in time for Natty.
Gunnar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636693
Title:
Premature lock when launching guest session
--
ubuntu-bugs
Actually it strikes me that it should probably be the guest-session-
launch script itself which should check the gconf key, and then lock or
not. This would then be closest to how things should behave in an ideal
world. But doing the gconf check from C is a lot faster, so Gunnar's
branch looks
Think I didn't really answered the question you asked, Ted.
On 2011-03-15 20:36, Ted Gould wrote:
What I don't understand is why you're against adding additional menu
items for new features.
I see it as customization of an existing feature, i.e. the tool for
launching restricted guest
For the record, I would also prefer that the indicator not locking the
screen by itself. The documented interface to launching a guest session
including screen locking is to simply call /usr/share/gdm/guest-session
/guest-session-launch.
But oh well, seems we agree to disagree, so the Opinion
Hi Ted,
I decided to make a last (promise) attempt; please see the new merge
proposal.
It struck me that it's unnecessary to fight about whose arguments are
the better, when it's possible to make both of us happy. :)
** Changed in: indicator-session
Status: Opinion = In Progress
**
Gunnar,
I think that the issue here is that we really want Guest Session to do
the same thing everywhere regardless of how they've configured their
computer. If you want it to do something else, and I think you have
some really interesting ideas about what it can do, let's give it a new
name so
@Ted
No, no, it seems like I have failed to explain the reasons for my suggestion.
I want to give users options; I want to make it easy to customize the
guest sessions. What makes guest sessions different compared to other
kinds of sessions is that you can't make use of the normal tools within
a
@Ted
The issue at hand is that launching a guest session via the main
(indicator-session) menu item prevents certain kinds of customization. That's
just as true now as it was when I reported the bug. You did not fix the issue
in some other way than I expected; you didn't fix it at all.
** Changed in: indicator-session
Status: Confirmed = Opinion
** Changed in: indicator-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636693
12 matches
Mail list logo
