Fixed in initramfs-tools-0.69ubuntu16
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Conrad
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Pre-releases of dapper did this (base-installer), but final dapper
wasn't supposed to. It does:
if [ -n "$ramdiskconf" -a "$resume" ]; then
if [ "$package" = initramfs-tools ]; then
mkdir -p /target/etc/mkinitramfs/conf.d
Oh, I note that Debian decided to gratuitously move /etc/mkinitramfs to
/etc/initramfs-tools in the version in Edgy. It's entirely possible that
the migration code in the preinst is broken.
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Colin,
do you recall any hack in d-i that would have mangled /etc/initramfs-
tools/initramfs.conf to set the proper RESUME partition in dapper?
Fabio
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:03:14PM -, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> nope.. that was a freshly installed dapper and upgraded to edgy..
> retested this morning twice. I think there is something else mangling
> that file. something in d-i perhaps?
Would have to be d-i.
--
- mdz
--
dapper -
nope.. that was a freshly installed dapper and upgraded to edgy..
retested this morning twice. I think there is something else mangling
that file. something in d-i perhaps?
Fabio
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:40:14AM -, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> --- /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf 2006-10-06 06:37:30.0 +0200
> +++ /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.dpkg-new2006-02-17
> 05:51:30.
> 0 +0100
> @@ -57,4 +57,4 @@
> # configured in conf.d/res
--- /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf 2006-10-06 06:37:30.0 +0200
+++ /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf.dpkg-new2006-02-17 05:51:30.
0 +0100
@@ -57,4 +57,4 @@
# configured in conf.d/resume. Manually specifying "resume=" on your
# kernel command line will always overri
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Fabio, please find out how this conffile was modified. I'd start by
looking at the diff from dpkg and comparing the current one on disk to
the version in the dapper package.
** Tags added: edgy-upgrades
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
u
Onkar, you clearly either don't understand what i wrote or don't
understand how configfiles work.
If i do *not* customize configfiles, these should be updated from the
old version to the new one without questions, no matter what kind of
system tool i use to upgrade.
Fabio
--
dapper -> edgy dist
This is not a bug. This is how it works from command line.
If you upgrade from GUI, it won't ask any questions and will keep your
configuration files by default.
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
On fresh dapper install, dist-upgrade to edgy. Nothing fancy installed
or changed. Just the bare default.
Fabio
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Target: None => ubuntu-6.10
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade prompts for questions
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63693
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
14 matches
Mail list logo
