[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-05 Thread Nattgew
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you in the latest kernel in Hardy? Thanks in advance. -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-ex

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Headers provided by linux-libc-dev are not meant to be used to build third-party modules for your kernel. You'd better use linux-headers-* packages for that. Did you install linux-headers-* from the kernel you want built your software for ? Don't forget to use -I and -L option of gcc (if this is

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Dave Barry
The problem when I reported this bug had nothing to do with kernel modules, as indicated by the snippet that reproduces the problem. /usr/include/asm/atomic.h was provided by the linux-libc-dev package. When you included this header file, breakage ensued. In hardy, this file no longer exists (and

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Hi Dave, I've used the word "Module" because the and header files were not designed for use in userspace, and would fail to compile on some architectures while silently giving non- atomic behavior on others. The C compiler provides its own atomic built- in functions that are suitable for use in

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-05 Thread Nattgew
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you in the latest kernel in Hardy? Thanks in advance. -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-ex

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Headers provided by linux-libc-dev are not meant to be used to build third-party modules for your kernel. You'd better use linux-headers-* packages for that. Did you install linux-headers-* from the kernel you want built your software for ? Don't forget to use -I and -L option of gcc (if this is

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Dave Barry
The problem when I reported this bug had nothing to do with kernel modules, as indicated by the snippet that reproduces the problem. /usr/include/asm/atomic.h was provided by the linux-libc-dev package. When you included this header file, breakage ensued. In hardy, this file no longer exists (and

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Hi Dave, I've used the word "Module" because the and header files were not designed for use in userspace, and would fail to compile on some architectures while silently giving non- atomic behavior on others. The C compiler provides its own atomic built- in functions that are suitable for use in

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Hi Dave, I've used the word "Module" because the and header files were not designed for use in userspace, and would fail to compile on some architectures while silently giving non- atomic behavior on others. The C compiler provides its own atomic built- in functions that are suitable for use in

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-05 Thread Nattgew
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you in the latest kernel in Hardy? Thanks in advance. -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-ex

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Headers provided by linux-libc-dev are not meant to be used to build third-party modules for your kernel. You'd better use linux-headers-* packages for that. Did you install linux-headers-* from the kernel you want built your software for ? Don't forget to use -I and -L option of gcc (if this is

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Dave Barry
The problem when I reported this bug had nothing to do with kernel modules, as indicated by the snippet that reproduces the problem. /usr/include/asm/atomic.h was provided by the linux-libc-dev package. When you included this header file, breakage ensued. In hardy, this file no longer exists (and

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Hi Dave, I've used the word "Module" because the and header files were not designed for use in userspace, and would fail to compile on some architectures while silently giving non- atomic behavior on others. The C compiler provides its own atomic built- in functions that are suitable for use in

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-05 Thread Nattgew
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you in the latest kernel in Hardy? Thanks in advance. -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-ex

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Headers provided by linux-libc-dev are not meant to be used to build third-party modules for your kernel. You'd better use linux-headers-* packages for that. Did you install linux-headers-* from the kernel you want built your software for ? Don't forget to use -I and -L option of gcc (if this is

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Dave Barry
The problem when I reported this bug had nothing to do with kernel modules, as indicated by the snippet that reproduces the problem. /usr/include/asm/atomic.h was provided by the linux-libc-dev package. When you included this header file, breakage ensued. In hardy, this file no longer exists (and

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-05 Thread Nattgew
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you in the latest kernel in Hardy? Thanks in advance. -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-ex

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Hi Dave, I've used the word "Module" because the and header files were not designed for use in userspace, and would fail to compile on some architectures while silently giving non- atomic behavior on others. The C compiler provides its own atomic built- in functions that are suitable for use in

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Headers provided by linux-libc-dev are not meant to be used to build third-party modules for your kernel. You'd better use linux-headers-* packages for that. Did you install linux-headers-* from the kernel you want built your software for ? Don't forget to use -I and -L option of gcc (if this is

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Dave Barry
The problem when I reported this bug had nothing to do with kernel modules, as indicated by the snippet that reproduces the problem. /usr/include/asm/atomic.h was provided by the linux-libc-dev package. When you included this header file, breakage ensued. In hardy, this file no longer exists (and

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Hi Dave, I've used the word "Module" because the and header files were not designed for use in userspace, and would fail to compile on some architectures while silently giving non- atomic behavior on others. The C compiler provides its own atomic built- in functions that are suitable for use in

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Headers provided by linux-libc-dev are not meant to be used to build third-party modules for your kernel. You'd better use linux-headers-* packages for that. Did you install linux-headers-* from the kernel you want built your software for ? Don't forget to use -I and -L option of gcc (if this is

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-18 Thread Dave Barry
The problem when I reported this bug had nothing to do with kernel modules, as indicated by the snippet that reproduces the problem. /usr/include/asm/atomic.h was provided by the linux-libc-dev package. When you included this header file, breakage ensued. In hardy, this file no longer exists (and

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2007-01-23 Thread kryshaam
I have the same problem ... and I need this file ;) -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h https://launchpad.net/bugs/65014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65014] Re: asm/atomic.h #includes non-existant header file, asm/processor.h

2008-06-05 Thread Nattgew
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you in the latest kernel in Hardy? Thanks in advance. -- asm/atomic.h #includes non-ex