[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-04-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.12+dfsg-3build1 --- openafs (1.4.12+dfsg-3build1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low * No-change rebuild against current pkg-create-dbgsym to fix broken debug symbol linking. (LP: #660360) -- Martin PittWed, 09 Feb 2011 15:12:55 +010

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-04-01 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
I've verified the package, the symbols are there with the proposed version, marking this as verification-done, thanks all. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-03-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/openafs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660360 Title: openafs debug information CRC mismatch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-02-11 Thread Anders Kaseorg
The version of openafs needs to be bumped from 1.4.12+dfsg-3 to 1.4.12+dfsg-3+build1, not just 1.4.12+dfsg-3build1. The problem is that openafs-modules-source generates a package openafs-modules-$(uname -r) with version 1.4.12+dfsg-3build1+2.6.32-28.55, and dpkg sorts version numbers as follows:

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-02-09 Thread Martin Pitt
I uploaded a no-change rebuild to lucid-proposed. Description already has the test case, and there is no source diff. ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-02-09 Thread Martin Pitt
I confirm that a simple rebuild fixes this, so pkg-create-dbgsym was already fixed in lucid. ** Changed in: pkg-create-dbgsym (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-02-09 Thread Martin Pitt
I just checked openafs-dbg on current natty, and it seems to be intact, so I'm closing this for natty and add a Lucid task instead. ** Changed in: pkg-create-dbgsym (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: openafs

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-02-08 Thread Evan Broder
** Also affects: pkg-create-dbgsym (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: pkg-create-dbgsym (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 660360] Re: openafs debug information CRC mismatch

2011-02-08 Thread Russ Allbery
For those triaging or looking at this bug, just wanted to note that I believe this is fallout from Ubuntu's handling of debug symbols, which has diverged from Debian. I don't believe this is an issue in the packages from the Debian perspective. I am happy to modify the package so that it will wor