There's something fishy going on,
/usr/bin/python /etc/ba[TAB] => prints a single completion, but doesn't apply
it.
bash_completion.d/
python /etc/ba[TAB] => /etc/bash_completion.d/
I think when testing this before, I had my completion dynamic loading
messed up, and wasn't getting /usr/share/
Can anyone else confirm that /usr/bin/python /etc/ba is a valid
testcase for this? Or is ln -s /usr/bin/python tmp/python needed?
I'm not seeing a problem on trusty with Nicolas's testcase, but I don't
have anything special with python source lying around.
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubunt
I just encountered this on my server, which is debian with bash
4.1.5(1)-release, python 2.6.6 and kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64
But it works with calling the python cmd only:
python /etc/bash_completion.d/
Exploit:
/usr/bin/python /etc/ba-bash: COMP_WORDS: Falscher Feldbezeichner.
sh
Notice: it does no
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660613
Titl
I have this problem when trying to use bash completion with a buildout
python.
The following is sufficient to trigger it:
bin/python
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660613
Title:
I noticed this problem too. One bit of information to add: it seems to
only happen when the python executable is being invoked via a symbolic
link. For example, if I want to run the script app.py in the current
directory, "/usr/bin/python a" causes the error, while
"/usr/bin/python2.6 a" does not
