[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.32-43.97 --- linux (2.6.32-43.97) lucid-proposed; urgency=low [Luis Henriques] * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1045405 [ Upstream Kernel Changes ] * rds: set correct msg_namelen - LP: #1031112 - CVE-2012-3430 * eCryp

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-10 Thread Tim Gardner
Marking verification-done-lucid since 'ulimit: raise default hard ulimit on number of files to 4096' is an upstream cherry-pick that has been successfully applied to subsequent kernels with no regression. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid ** Tags added: verification-done-lucid -- You re

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Lucid in -proposed solves the problem (2.6.32-43.97). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-lucid' to 'verification-done-lucid'. If verification is not done by

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/linux-ec2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) To m

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-04 Thread Tim Gardner
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Scott Ritchie (scottritchie) -- You received this bug n

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-04 Thread Tim Gardner
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Assigne

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2012-09-04 Thread Scott Ritchie
I'm going to nominate this for Lucid, as I ran into this issue a few times in live environments. A quick web search for ubuntu nginx 1024 file will reveal a lot of similar people having the issue. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects:

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-09-22 Thread Tim Gardner
** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but k

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-09-21 Thread Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot
The attachment "Increase the default FD hard limit to 4096" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by re

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-09-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-ti-omap4 - 2.6.38-1209.15 --- linux-ti-omap4 (2.6.38-1209.15) natty-proposed; urgency=low * Release tracking bug - LP: #837761 [ Paolo Pisati ] * [Config] Turn on CONFIG_USER_NS and DEVPTS_MULTIPLE_INSTANCES. - LP: #787749 [ T

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-04-25 Thread Tim Gardner
** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-04-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.38-8.41 --- linux (2.6.38-8.41) natty; urgency=low [ Luke Yelavich ] * [Config] Disable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP on 32-bit powerpc kernels - LP: #745358 * [Config] Disable CONFIG_DRM_RADEON_KMS on powerpc kernels * [Config] Build som

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-31 Thread Dan Kegel
Upsteam bug report comment: --- Comment #1 from Andrew Morton 2011-03-31 20:24:33 --- Send it to lkml, please. CC me and anyone else who might be interested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-31 Thread Dan Kegel
Filed upstream bug, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #32382 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-31 Thread Tim Gardner
** Patch added: "Increase the default FD hard limit to 4096" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/linux/+bug/663090/+attachment/1959980/+files/0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-Increase-the-default-hard-limit-for-ope.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-31 Thread Tim Gardner
New patch pending that leaves the default soft limit at 1024 and raises the default hard limit to 4096 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
discussed on IRC, this patch raised both the hard and soft limits where we only want to raise the hard limit. Reopening. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Fix Released => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.38-8.40 --- linux (2.6.38-8.40) natty; urgency=low [ Brad Figg ] * [Config] Set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256 for amd64 generic - LP: #737124 [ Henrik Rydberg ] * SAUCE: HID: hid-ntrig: add support for 1b96:0006 model * SAUCE: HID: n

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-30 Thread Tim Gardner
Dan - you can test it out by pulling from https://launchpad.net/~kernel- ppa/+archive/pre-proposed?field.series_filter=natty (as soon as its done building) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-29 Thread Susan Cragin
The above comment was posted in error. I thought it was a personal message and didn't check the recipient. Sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descri

Re: [Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-29 Thread Susan Cragin
home/susan/wine/dlls/winejack.drv' make: *** [dlls/winejack.drv] Error 2 -Original Message- >From: Dan Kegel >Sent: Mar 29, 2011 7:51 PM >To: susancra...@earthlink.net >Subject: [Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but >keep soft limit at

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-29 Thread Dan Kegel
Can't wait to try it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-29 Thread Tim Gardner
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) -- You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
No. It is the policy of the pam package to not deviate from the kernel defaults for ulimits. pam is not the place to make this change; if the default ulimits are wrong in the kernel, they should be fixed in the kernel. ** Package changed: pam (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-26 Thread Scott Ritchie
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => pam (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) -- ub

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-25 Thread Dan Kegel
$ dpkg-query -S /etc/security/limits.conf libpam-modules: /etc/security/limits.conf This bug should probably be against libpam-modules, since the fix is to add one or two lines to /etc/security/limits.conf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-25 Thread Kelytha
+1 Valve's games based on the Source engine also suffer from this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft lim

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-25 Thread Dan Kegel
Is this done for Natty yet? I'm installing League of Legends right now, and watching the number of wineserver's open fd's creep towards 1024, at which point it will probably explode. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-09 Thread Scott Ritchie
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-03-08 Thread Charlie Schluting
+1 this low limit bites server users all the time.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) --

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-01-19 Thread Scott Ritchie
I should note the Ubuntu-devel mailing list agrees with me: http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com/msg00146.html *namedrops Kees Cook and Steve Langasek* ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2011-01-19 Thread Dan Kegel
Please reconsider. An increasing number of apps are going to be hurt by this low hard limit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 Title: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2010-11-14 Thread Gursimran singh Mohar
Even if the due to the issue, many application does not run under wine(as stated in the bug comment #2). The setting for the file descriptor seems to be quite intentional. So i'm marking it a wishlist, and leave the decision with the person concerned.. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2010-11-09 Thread Scott Ritchie
Moving to Linux package where it belongs, according to the mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-November/031946.html ** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) -- Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 663090] Re: Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024)

2010-11-09 Thread Scott Ritchie
** Summary changed: - Why can't Johnny handle 1025 file descriptors? + Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) -- Please raise file descriptor hard limit to 4096 (but keep soft limit at 1024) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090 You received this bug notif