This sort of idea needs to be kicked around on the devel mailing list.
In fact, it and a number of related ideas have been, and several have
been implemented since this bug was filed. Since this report is not
well described, I'm going to go ahead and close it now.
** Changed in: ubuntu
St
Guy, I've subscribed you to the blueprint, since it was your report to
begin with. I've also linked it back to this bug.
--
Ubuntu volatile?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
I've created a blueprint for this, see here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/volatile-repository
--
Ubuntu volatile?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
I agree that this is a good idea and rides along the lines of Backports,
but it will have to be a different kind of effort. A Ubuntu volatile
repository will require deep involvement of the Ubuntu developers. I'd
love to have a Ubuntu volatile repository too!
Please spec something up so we can mor
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Ubuntu volatile?
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66398
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Thanks for your report. This sounds like a good idea. This is not where
you should place such requests though -your idea might get more
attention and have the possibility of being implemented if you would
submit a specification for this.
You should first check whether it already exists at the Ubun
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Backporters
--
Ubuntu volatile?
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66398
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
