[Bug 666539] Re: Improve misleading description of fonts entries

2010-11-13 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
You say the licensing information is a separate issue, so I'll remove that and unmark the duplicate. Meanwhile, you are probably correct that I am missing the point. To me, even excluding the licensing information, you seem to be conflating three distinct issues. 1. You say there is a "strong neg

[Bug 666539] Re: Improve misleading description of fonts entries

2010-11-11 Thread Nicolas Spalinger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 435183 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435183 Hi Matthew, thank you for your work. You seem to be missing the point here. I'm well aware of the paid-for apps in the Software Center. Yet, "Free" in English is way too ambiguous and you are certainly not

[Bug 666539] Re: Improve misleading description of fonts entries

2010-11-10 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 435183 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435183 Hi Nicolas, and thanks for all your work on fonts. Because some items in Ubuntu Software Center (and in equivalent utilities on other platforms) have a price, USC needs to be clear about all those that do not