[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-12-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The new version seems fine, can you move the vcs to the gnomemm team as well? I will review gtkmm now and sponsor both later on if gtkmm is ready to go ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-12-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
hum, you added the epoch to the rules shlib version, could you drop it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 Title: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-12-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 Title: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-12-06 Thread Krzysztof Klimonda
I've uploaded a new version of the package to the REVU, fixed all the problems you have found out and one more I've spotted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 Title:

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: ubuntu Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your work, some comments on the current revu version: - you should drop the 1: from the shlib version in the rules - shouldn't the packaging license be the same than the source one, LGPL rather GPL? - do you have a gtkmm update to go with this one, both need to be upgraded together

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-18 Thread Krzysztof Klimonda
** Description changed: Atkmm has been split from Gtkmm 2.22.0 and now lives as a separate module. As it is a dependency of Gtkmm 2.22.0 it has to be packaged before we can update. + + revu packaging: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/atkmm1.6 + svn

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-13 Thread Josh McFarlane
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid -- [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-13 Thread Krzysztof Klimonda
Would you mind not changing the status without adding a comment about the reason behind the change? atkmm1.6 still has to be packaged, either in Ubuntu or Debian so this change makes no sense. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid = New -- [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-10 Thread Bilal Akhtar
Un-subscribing sponsors, new packages don't go through the packaging process. Furthermore, no patch or package is attached/linked. -- [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 672817] Re: [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6

2010-11-08 Thread Krzysztof Klimonda
** Package changed: gdcm (Ubuntu) = ubuntu -- [needs-packaging] atkmm1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com